1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1098(97)00398-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Tc on hydrostatic pressure in β″-(ET)2SF5CH2CF2SO3 and κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 In previous hydrostaticpressure studies up to about 2.3 kbar, dT c /dp ϭϪ1.34 K/kbar was determined by use of ac-susceptibility measurements. 4 This fits with thermal-expansion results that gave a similar initial hydrostatic-pressure dependence of T c . 18 For this material no other pressure-dependent properties have been reported so far.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 In previous hydrostaticpressure studies up to about 2.3 kbar, dT c /dp ϭϪ1.34 K/kbar was determined by use of ac-susceptibility measurements. 4 This fits with thermal-expansion results that gave a similar initial hydrostatic-pressure dependence of T c . 18 For this material no other pressure-dependent properties have been reported so far.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The decrease of the superconducting transition temperature T c with applied pressure is extraordinarily large and may reach up to dT c /dpϷϪ3.8 K/kbars for the 2D organic superconductor -(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu(NCS) 2 , where BEDT-TTF stands for bisethylenedithio-tetrathiafulvalene ͑or ET for short͒. 3,4 The origin of the strong pressure effect on T c in organic superconductors is not fully understood, but phenomenologically it is caused either by a decreasing density of states at the Fermi level as a result of an increasing electronic bandwidth or by a reduced interaction potential between the Cooper pairs. Both effects lead to a reduced coupling strength causing T c ϰexp(Ϫ1/) to decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the superconducting transition is sharp, and the in-plane dc conductivity is on the order of 300 ⍀ Ϫ1 cm Ϫ1 near 10 K. The pressure dependence of T c is typical of that of many ET salts (dT c /dPϭ1.34 K/kbar͒. 13 An estimate of the 300 K microwave conductivity via ESR shows an anisotropy of b / a Ϸ1.4 in the conducting plane. 14,15 Analogous to other ␤Љ compounds, 16 electronic band-structure calculations predict a Fermi surface ͑FS͒ consisting of a pair of one-dimensional ͑1D͒ electronic bands and a two-dimensional ͑2D͒ hole pocket, which is 14.8% of the first Brillouin zone ͑FBZ͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Comparative Raman studies on on deuterated and undeuterated κ-(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu(NCS) 2 may also be interpreted in this way [35]. It might also be possible to simulate the size and direction of change of T c experienced upon deuteration from the anisotropic compressibility [24,36] of κ-(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu(NCS) 2 , and the strongly anisotropic uniaxial pressure dependence of its superconducting transition temperature [37,38,39]. However, neither of these explanations can shed any light on the very obvious relationship between the details of the Fermi-surface shape and T c , shown by our data (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: F(p)/f(0)mentioning
confidence: 99%