1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.44.7614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of the flux-creep activation energy on the magnetization current for aLa1.86Sr0.14

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An exponential temperature (as well as magnetic field) dependence of the critical current density in superconductors with weak pinning is expected from flux creep [18]. A precise analysis of these dependencies must also reflect the scaling of fundamental pinning related parameters on temperature, as well as on magnetic field [19]. To take into account the dependence of these parameters on temperature we have rescaled the temperature axis by a function g(T)=1-(T/T c ) 2 (see Figure 5b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exponential temperature (as well as magnetic field) dependence of the critical current density in superconductors with weak pinning is expected from flux creep [18]. A precise analysis of these dependencies must also reflect the scaling of fundamental pinning related parameters on temperature, as well as on magnetic field [19]. To take into account the dependence of these parameters on temperature we have rescaled the temperature axis by a function g(T)=1-(T/T c ) 2 (see Figure 5b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size and variation of C with applied field required for a smooth fit of the data over a large temperature range was perceived to be physically unreasonable. 23 To overcome this, the introduction of a temperature scaling term was suggested, to separate the explicit temperature dependence of U e f f from the current dependence. This modified Maley's method can be verified by considering U e f f (J,H,T) as a separable function 25 of applied field, temperature, and current density.…”
Section: Analysis Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, as followed in Ref. 23, takes known temperature-scaling forms determined theoretically and applies them directly to the data. U e f f (J,H,T) is divided by the scaling term, and values for C are chosen to provide the best continuity of U e f f (J,H,T 0 ) over the entire temperature range.…”
Section: Analysis Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 This dependence of U over J is a good approximation for the creep activation barrier in the single-vortex creep regime (limit μ → 0) and provides a proper fit of the experimental U (J ) dependence observed in different superconductors. [51][52][53][54] The divergence of U (J ) when J → 0 can be understood in the context of the collective pinning considering that in the vortexglass state vortex motion is possible only in the presence of a current. 44 In the case of this logarithmic dependence of the activation energy on the critical current, a power-law time dependence of the magnetization is expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%