2008
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/15/152005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of the sticking coefficient of sputtered atoms on the target–substrate distance

Abstract: A Ti target was mounted on a planar magnetron and sputtered in a mixture of Ar and N 2 , resulting in a flux of metallic Ti particles forming a TiN film on a substrate. The sticking coefficient of Ti was determined by comparing the Ti flux towards the substrate with the actual amount of deposited Ti particles, as determined by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. It was observed that the sticking coefficient of Ti increases significantly with increasing target-substrate distance, but is to a lesser extent i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the sticking coefficients for N and Ti atoms, information can be obtained on the stoichiometry of the deposited TiN x film. Assuming a sticking coefficient of 1 for N atoms,16 and of 0.5 for Ti atoms,18 the fluxes presented in Figure 6b would give rise to a stoichiometry x much larger than one. However, in ref.…”
Section: Particle‐in‐cell–monte Carlo Collisions (Pic‐mcc) Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the sticking coefficients for N and Ti atoms, information can be obtained on the stoichiometry of the deposited TiN x film. Assuming a sticking coefficient of 1 for N atoms,16 and of 0.5 for Ti atoms,18 the fluxes presented in Figure 6b would give rise to a stoichiometry x much larger than one. However, in ref.…”
Section: Particle‐in‐cell–monte Carlo Collisions (Pic‐mcc) Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful qualitative indication of whether variations in sticking coefficient affect the film composition is that such variations result 28 in a temperature-dependent, but not pressure-dependent, film composition. (This "rule of thumb", however, is not necessarily always valid [128], and should be used with some skepticism.) For MAX phases, evaporative loss of the A element during thin-film growth has been observed in several MAX-phase systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion‐to‐atom ratio increases when the N 2 flow is increased at constant C . This is mainly due to a lower atom flux towards the substrate as a higher N 2 flow will increase the degree of target poisoning 14, 15. The decrease in ion‐to‐atom ratio at constant N 2 flow when C deviates from 6.28 can be explained by the increase in discharge voltage discussed in 3.1 and the resulting increased deposition rate from 3.2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%