2018
DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency of prepulse inhibition deficits on baseline startle reactivity in a mouse model of the human 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome

Abstract: Hemizygous microdeletion at the chromosomal locus 22q11.2 is a copy number variation with strong genetic linkage to schizophrenia and related disorders. This association, along with its phenotypic overlap with the 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome, has motivated the establishment of Df[h22q11]/+ mice, in which the human 22q11.2 orthologous region is deleted. Previous investigations using this model showed the presence of reduced prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex, a form of sensorimotor gati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, fluctuations of psychotic symptoms in SZ resemble the relapsing remitting pattern of prototypical immunological disorders, suggesting that the peripheral inflammation 5 22qDS+SZ iBBB exhibited substantially impaired barrier integrity, despite the genetic variability introduced by our approach. This phenotype was substantiated in vivo in a 22qDS mouse model harboring a homologous hemizygous deletion (Didriksen et al, 2017;Nilsson et al, 2018;Scarborough et al, 2019). We further interrogated junctional protein expression and immune privilege properties of the BBB in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, fluctuations of psychotic symptoms in SZ resemble the relapsing remitting pattern of prototypical immunological disorders, suggesting that the peripheral inflammation 5 22qDS+SZ iBBB exhibited substantially impaired barrier integrity, despite the genetic variability introduced by our approach. This phenotype was substantiated in vivo in a 22qDS mouse model harboring a homologous hemizygous deletion (Didriksen et al, 2017;Nilsson et al, 2018;Scarborough et al, 2019). We further interrogated junctional protein expression and immune privilege properties of the BBB in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To evaluate the 22qDS BBB in vivo, we utilized a mouse strain harboring a hemizygous deletion of the 22qDS homologous region on chromosome 16 (Didriksen et al, 2017;Nilsson et al, 2018;Scarborough et al, 2019). These mice mimic much of the biology of 22qDS in humans, including facial deformities and SZ-associated behavioral changes (Didriksen et al, 2017;Nilsson et al, 2018;Scarborough et al, 2019). We assessed BBB integrity by quantifying extravasation of blood proteins into the CNS parenchyma of 22qDS mice and their wild type (WT) littermates.…”
Section: Barrier Function Is Impaired In the 22qds Bbbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensorimotor gating is a critical process for preventing sensory overload to ensure normal information processing ( Ioannidou et al, 2018 ; Gómez-Nieto et al, 2020 ). Since baseline startle response can be a confounding factor in interpreting PPI ( Yee et al, 2005 ; Shoji and Miyakawa, 2018 ; Scarborough et al, 2019 ), we analyzed both PPI and the ASR individually. Interestingly, we observed intact PPI in all mice regardless of sex and genotype, indicating their ability to suppress a motor response after a prepulse preceded the startle stimulus ( Figure 9 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed increased acoustic startle response in the Q22 model, but in contrast to previously published studies we did not observe reduced % prepulse inhibition in Q22 mice [ 15 , 17 ]. This may have been confounded by the robust increased startle response at baseline or “first startle”—meaning prior to any prepulse + pulse trial—requiring a larger sample size to elucidate the effect on % prepulse inhibition [ 40 ]. In general, small sample sizes, particularly for the open-field and object-in-place tasks, were a limitation in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%