Depicting current case management models

Mas-Expósito, Laia; Campos, Juan Antonio Amador; Gómez-Benito, Juana; Lalucat-Jo, Lluís

doi:10.1177/1468017313477296

Cited by 9 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(129 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the 1960’s case management emerged in response to the de-institutionalisation of large numbers of people with severe mental health conditions who required referral to outpatient health and other community services. During the 1970’s and 1980’s, the increasing cost of health care and de-centralisation of health services influenced the role of case managers [ 5 6 ]. Since the 1990’s, case management has existed in a range of settings including acute, post-acute hospital, rehabilitation, long term care and community-based settings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Case management tasks are now performed by people from various disciplines, for people with different problems in diverse contexts and communities. These multiple interdependent and interacting parameters of case management produce variability in the description of case management [ 5 7 8 9 ]. The significant terminological variance, lack of understanding and a common language for case management and care coordination has impeded quality analysis, policy and planning [ 4 10 11 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review

Lukersmith¹,

Millington²,

Salvador‐Carulla

2016

Int J Integr Care

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The description of case management in research and clinical practice is highly variable which impedes quality analysis, policy and planning. Case management makes a unique contribution towards the integration of health care, social services and other sector services and supports for people with complex health conditions. There are multiple components and variations of case management depending on the context and client population. This paper aims to scope and map case management in the literature to identify how case management is described in the literature for key complex health conditions (e.g., brain injury, diabetes, mental health, spinal cord injury). Following literature searches in multiple databases, grey literature and exclusion by health condition, community-based and adequate description, there were 661 potential papers for data extraction. Data from 79 papers (1988–2013) were analysed to the point of saturation (no new information) and mapped to the model, components and activities. The results included 22 definitions, five models, with 69 activities or tasks of case managers mapped to 17 key components (interventions). The results confirm the significant terminological variance in case management which produces role confusion, ambiguity and hinders comparability across different health conditions and contexts. There is an urgent need for an internationally agreed taxonomy for the coordination, navigation and management of care.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review

Lukersmith¹,

Millington²,

Salvador‐Carulla

2016

Int J Integr Care

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…in cases with a pending eviction notice). The nurse's intervention incorporates some features of case management (Mas‐Expósito, Amador‐Campos, Gómez‐Benito, & Lalucat‐Jo, ), including the establishment and maintenance of a supportive relationship with the client, linking the client to relevant health services (e.g. cognitive testing, home health support), serving as a liaison with family members or health professionals, and advocating for tenancy preservation or safe home conditions upon hospital discharge (Bratiotis, Woody, & Lauster, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can cities tackle hoarding? Examining an intervention program bringing together fire and health authorities in Vancouver

Kysow

Bratiotis

Lauster

et al. 2020

Health Soc Care Community

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hoarded homes can pose a threat to public safety, with heightened risks of fire hazards, pest infestations and noxious odours in both the home and neighbouring dwellings. Communities across North America are responding to these public safety concerns through a harm reduction approach. This descriptive study explores the implementation and outcomes of the City of Vancouver's approach involving a partnership between fire prevention and public health. Data were collected from the team's 2016–2018 case tracking systems, consisting of health records and team intervention record, as well as notes taken from case briefing meetings. Study objectives included describing the intervention model, providing descriptive statistics on clients and their clutter volume, the interventions undertaken, and exploring predictors of clutter volume and case outcome through exploratory analyses. The sample included 82 cases involving severely hoarded conditions or more moderate hoarding conditions paired with additional client vulnerabilities (e.g. health conditions, frailty). Results from paired samples t‐tests and regression analysis, suggest the Hoarding Action Response Team's (HART) model of a community‐based intervention for hoarding was associated with clutter reduction and tenancy preservation. HART successfully maintained engagement with most clients, and most cases were closed within six home visits. Despite these successes, the team dealt with several barriers including client avoidance and limited resources. This paper provides guidance for communities who are working to develop a coordinated response to problems associated with hoarding and begins to establish expectations for what can be achieved through a community‐based hoarding intervention model.

show abstract

“…Assertive community treatment (ACT) is an evidenced-based practice that is effective at working with individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI) who have not responded to traditional treatment modalities and have a history of multiple hospitalizations (Bromley et al, 2017; Mas-Exposito et al, 2014; Smith & Newton, 2007). ACT is a multidisciplinary, community-based, mobile treatment program that works using an integrated team approach with shared caseloads.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It provides 24-hr round-the-clock services with an in vivo approach to treatment, and it has a low staff-to-client ratio (Bond & Drake, 2015; Stein & Santos, 1998). Furthermore, there is empirical support for the effectiveness of the ACT model for reducing hospitalizations and increasing community tenure (Bond & Drake, 2015; Coldwell, 2007; Mas-Expósito et al, 2014; Smith & Newton, 2007). ACT service recipients have higher needs than other groups of individuals receiving mental health services.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Illness Identity in Assertive Community Treatment

Waynor

Eissenstat

Yanos

et al. 2019

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assertive community treatment (ACT) provides comprehensive clinical services, including vocational rehabilitation, to individuals with psychiatric disorders for which traditional community mental health services are insufficient. ACT is an evidence-based intervention yielding many positive outcomes, yet service recipients continue to struggle with workforce involvement. The purpose of this study is to determine whether internalized stigma, psychiatric hospitalization, and psychiatric symptoms are associated with work-related self-efficacy among ACT service recipients. A total of 72 individuals with severe mental illness were recruited from ACT programs in three counties in a Mid-Atlantic state. Multiple linear regression was conducted to examine the relationship between work-related self-efficacy and the independent variables of internalized stigma, psychiatric hospitalization, and psychiatric symptoms. Higher internalized stigma scores were negatively associated with work-related self-efficacy (β = −.31, t = −2.32, p < .05), while psychiatric hospitalization in the past year was positively associated with work-related self-efficacy (β = .22−.27, t = −2.13, p < .05). Findings from this study suggests internalized stigma to be an important recovery variable requiring the attention of ACT team members when preparing individuals for work, while countering the assumption that recent hospitalization is a barrier to work-related self-efficacy.

show abstract

Depicting current case management models

Cited by 9 publications

References 38 publications

What is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review

What is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review

How can cities tackle hoarding? Examining an intervention program bringing together fire and health authorities in Vancouver

The Role of Illness Identity in Assertive Community Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About