2022
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12030307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depicting People in Visual Cues Affects Alcohol Cue Reactivity in Male Alcohol-Dependent Patients

Abstract: Cue reactivity is often used to study alcohol cues brain responses. Standardized image sets are used, but the effect of viewing people interacting with the alcohol drink remains unclear, which is associated with the factors of alcohol cues that influence the degree of response to alcohol stimuli. The present study used fMRI to investigate the reactivity of alcohol dependence (AD) inpatients to alcohol cues with or without human drinking behavior. Cues with a human interacting with a drink were hypothesized to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adult research has systematically varied physical and social drinking context in laboratory cue‐reactivity paradigms (Nees et al, 2012) such as by comparing reactivity to images of people adults regularly smoke with versus not (Conklin et al, 2013) and evaluating cue reactivity to in vivo smoking cues when peers are present or not (Dimoff et al, 2019). Among adults, neurophysiological markers of craving also differ as a function of peer contexts in alcohol images (Alarefi et al, 2022; Martins et al, 2019; Nees et al, 2012; Schwabe & Wolf, 2013). Together, adult studies examining self‐report and physiological indicators of cue‐elicited craving suggest that substance‐using peers may serve as potent cues that elicit craving in youth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult research has systematically varied physical and social drinking context in laboratory cue‐reactivity paradigms (Nees et al, 2012) such as by comparing reactivity to images of people adults regularly smoke with versus not (Conklin et al, 2013) and evaluating cue reactivity to in vivo smoking cues when peers are present or not (Dimoff et al, 2019). Among adults, neurophysiological markers of craving also differ as a function of peer contexts in alcohol images (Alarefi et al, 2022; Martins et al, 2019; Nees et al, 2012; Schwabe & Wolf, 2013). Together, adult studies examining self‐report and physiological indicators of cue‐elicited craving suggest that substance‐using peers may serve as potent cues that elicit craving in youth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%