2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depletion and refertilization of the Tethyan oceanic upper mantle as revealed by the early Jurassic Refahiye ophiolite, NE Anatolia—Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Melt produced in the mantle is likely to crystallize when it migrates through the depleted mantle peridotite, leading to melt refertilization in the peridotites (Jull et al 2002;Dijkstra et al 2003;Seyler et al 2007;Uysal et al 2013). Based on the whole-rock composition of peridotites, Elthon et al (1992) first proposed the concept of melt refertilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melt produced in the mantle is likely to crystallize when it migrates through the depleted mantle peridotite, leading to melt refertilization in the peridotites (Jull et al 2002;Dijkstra et al 2003;Seyler et al 2007;Uysal et al 2013). Based on the whole-rock composition of peridotites, Elthon et al (1992) first proposed the concept of melt refertilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemical compositions of mantle‐derived ultramafic–mafic rock suites provide significant clues to address their genesis, source characters, and mantle evolution as well as variable extents of melting, melt extraction, enrichment‐depletion processes, melt refertilization, metasomatism, etc. Alpine‐type ultramafic–mafic intrusions and ophiolites in orogenic belts preserve geochemical signatures of (a) depleted, MOR‐type mantle that experienced several melt extraction events, (b) melt migration and refertilization, and (c) subduction‐derived metasomatic imprints collectively suggesting evolution of oceanic lithosphere in suprasubduction zone environment and subduction–accretion processes during ocean basin closure (Saha et al, ; Seyler, Lorand, Toplis, & Godard, ; Uysal et al, ). Alaskan‐type ultramafic–mafic intrusions originate from subduction‐processed arc magmas and are emplaced in island arc or active continental margins settings and represent uplifted fragments of concentrically zoned roots of island and continental arcs comprising an ultramafic core and more evolved mafic shells (Abdallah, Ali, & Obeid, ; Dong et al, ; Eyuboglu et al, ; Habtoor, Ahmed, & Harbi, ; Tseng et al, ; L. Yuan, Zhang, Yang, Lu, & Chen, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the postcollisional Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary volcanic rocks in the Ulukışla basin in the southern part of central Anatolia have higher 87 Sr/ 86 Sr and lower 143 Nd/ 144 Nd ratios than those of the lamprophyres in the Ankara Mélange, indicating an EMII with recycled, continent-derived material. The Late Cretaceous high-K volcanic rocks representing active continental margin arc units in the eastern Pontides with (Alpaslan et al, 2004(Alpaslan et al, , 2006Dilek, 2006, 2013;Dilek and Altunkaynak, 2007;Keskin et al, 2008;Gündogdu-Atakay, 2009;Sarifakioglu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Source Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çelik et al (2011) reported the amphibolites in the ophiolitic mélange near Çankırı giving dates between 177.08 ± 0.96 Ma and 166.9 ± 1.1 Ma from amphibole ages. In the eastern part of the investigated area, the isotropic gabbros of Refahiye (Erzincan) ophiolite with MORB-like to island arc tholeiite (IAT) typical geochemical signatures of SSZ oceanic crust give uranium-lead (U-Pb) zircon age of 183 ± 1 Ma (Uysal et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%