Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2017: Sustainability, Success and Impact 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3093338.3093379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deploying RMACC Summit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the instructions disabled, the machine passed CAM-ECT. We list results from the machines in Table 1 with FMA enabled and disabled on SUMMIT (note that the SUMMIT results can also be found in Anderson et al, 2017), and with xCORE-AVX2 (a set of optimizations that activates FMA) enabled and disabled on CHEYENNE. Finally, a third type of should pass experiments is the minimal code modifications from Milroy et al (2016) that were developed to test the variability and classification power of CESM-ECT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the instructions disabled, the machine passed CAM-ECT. We list results from the machines in Table 1 with FMA enabled and disabled on SUMMIT (note that the SUMMIT results can also be found in Anderson et al, 2017), and with xCORE-AVX2 (a set of optimizations that activates FMA) enabled and disabled on CHEYENNE. Finally, a third type of should pass experiments is the minimal code modifications from Milroy et al (2016) that were developed to test the variability and classification power of CESM-ECT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulations were performed at sea level using the RMACC Summit supercomputer (Anderson et al, 2017). Each simulation produced a grid of predicted magnetic field vector (B) containing the X, Y, and Z components' real and imaginary parts, so that the amplitude and phase for each component may be determined (phase was determined using tan −1 (ℑP∕ℜP), where P stands for the corresponding component of the predicted magnetic field and ℜ and ℑ, respectively, denote the real and imaginary parts).…”
Section: Forward Modeling the M 2 Magnetic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A best estimate maximum likelihood tree was generated with 100 bootstrap replicates under the GTRGAMMA model using RAxML (Stamatakis 2014). All data were processed using the University of Colorado's SUMMIT High Performance Cluster (Anderson et al 2017).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Signal In Ruelliamentioning
confidence: 99%