1987
DOI: 10.2514/3.25873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deployment analysis of the Olympus Astromast and comparison with test measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the three results in phase B, it can be found that the numerical result is a constant value because it is obtained while ignoring the mast deployment dynamic effects, and both simulation and test results fluctuate periodically near the numerical results. The main reason for the periodic fluctuation of the axial development force is the reflection of energy conversion when a section is unrolled in the local coil mode, which can be called "snap through" [16]. At this moment, the deformation energy of longerons and battens is quickly transformed into the kinetic energy of the top plate, resulting in a sudden increase in the axial development force.…”
Section: Validation Of Axial Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the three results in phase B, it can be found that the numerical result is a constant value because it is obtained while ignoring the mast deployment dynamic effects, and both simulation and test results fluctuate periodically near the numerical results. The main reason for the periodic fluctuation of the axial development force is the reflection of energy conversion when a section is unrolled in the local coil mode, which can be called "snap through" [16]. At this moment, the deformation energy of longerons and battens is quickly transformed into the kinetic energy of the top plate, resulting in a sudden increase in the axial development force.…”
Section: Validation Of Axial Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the deployment mechanism must be endowed with sufficient strengths and stiffness to ensure it to be free from failures such as fracture and disconnection and unexpected elastic and plastic deformations under given endurable mechanical environmental testing conditions. The mechanical responses generated do not affect use performance of the equipment and should satisfy the stipulated safety margin [8][9] . Structural design of the equipment warrants check analysis of strength and rigidity.…”
Section: Technical Requirements Of Preparing the Deployment Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key part of the mechanism for Langmuir probes, the deployable mechanism must be endowed with sufficient strength and stiffness. To ensure Langmuir probes to be free from damage under given mechanical experimental testing conditions, finite element analysis of the mechanism of Langmuir probes is of significance to research and preparation of Langmuir probes [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphey proposed methods for weight-optimal design of booms and for the rational judgment of boom performance [7,8]. Eiden et al presented a continuous-longeron space mast which can change from a helical coiled state into a straight deployed configuration [9]. However, for the large-scaled membrane antenna, the space thermal environment will inevitably induce deformation to the supporting structure, affecting the shape accuracy of the membrane [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%