2016 IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments (WiSEE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wisee.2016.7877317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deployment of a wireless sensor network in assembly, integration and test activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar perspective was presented in, which synthesized the drawbacks of ZigBee (ie, unavailability of time scheduling on MAC, poor network scalability, inefficient energy management, and inability to inter‐operate with devices from other vendors) and highlighted the improvements gradually introduced by WirelessHART (ie, channel hopping, which positively impacts the multipath propagation problem, and TDMA scheduling with fixed time‐slots), ISA‐100.11a (ability to inter‐operate with devices from different vendors, transmit power control, variable time‐slots), and IEEE 802.15.4e/6LoWPAN (ie, time‐slotted channel hopping, ability to integrate the wireless sensor network [WSN] to any network, and Internet of Things application readiness because of IPv6 mapping capability).…”
Section: Wireless Intra‐spacecraft Communications Overviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar perspective was presented in, which synthesized the drawbacks of ZigBee (ie, unavailability of time scheduling on MAC, poor network scalability, inefficient energy management, and inability to inter‐operate with devices from other vendors) and highlighted the improvements gradually introduced by WirelessHART (ie, channel hopping, which positively impacts the multipath propagation problem, and TDMA scheduling with fixed time‐slots), ISA‐100.11a (ability to inter‐operate with devices from different vendors, transmit power control, variable time‐slots), and IEEE 802.15.4e/6LoWPAN (ie, time‐slotted channel hopping, ability to integrate the wireless sensor network [WSN] to any network, and Internet of Things application readiness because of IPv6 mapping capability).…”
Section: Wireless Intra‐spacecraft Communications Overviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…UWB with the low‐latency deterministic network (LLDN) mode was considered by DLR in for the Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystem (AOCS), because this combination provides robust wireless communications within a highly reflective environment and meets the critical latency requirements (i.e., 10 ms or less). A wireless solution for AIT activities employing the IEEE 802.15.4e/6LoWPAN technology was also proposed by DLR in Niemelä et al and the overall results showed nearly error‐free communications.…”
Section: Wireless Intra‐spacecraft Communications Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%