1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01782.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depolarization and Faraday effects in galaxies

Abstract: Faraday rotation and depolarization of synchrotron radio emission are considered in a consistent general approach, under conditions typical of spiral galaxies, i.e. when the magneto‐ionic medium and relativistic electrons are non‐uniformly distributed in a layer containing both regular and fluctuating components of magnetic field, thermal electron density and synchrotron emissivity. We demonstrate that non‐uniformity of the magneto‐ionic medium along the line of sight strongly affects the observable polarizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
674
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(689 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
13
674
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting Gaussian fit, given in Fig. 10, is very close to the anomalous depolarization (Sokoloff et al 1998;Homan 2012) or to the smearing of multiple RM components (Conway et al 1974). …”
Section: Linear Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting Gaussian fit, given in Fig. 10, is very close to the anomalous depolarization (Sokoloff et al 1998;Homan 2012) or to the smearing of multiple RM components (Conway et al 1974). …”
Section: Linear Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The dependence differs from the expected behavior for the optically thick region of a jet (Pacholczyk & Swihart 1967). Possible explanations for such behavior are the following: (i) anomalous (Sokoloff et al 1998) or inverse (Homan 2012) depolarization, which appears in a regular twisted or tangled magnetic fields; (ii) spectral depolarization (Conway et al 1974) due to smearing of multiple components within the observed region. Unfortunately, distinguishing between these alternatives is difficult.…”
Section: +611mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where p0 is the intrinsic fractional polarization and ǫ is the synchrotron emissivity at a depth along the line of sight (Burn 1966;Gardner & Whiteoak 1966;Sokoloff et al 1998). The polarization angle φ(x, y) is given by φ(x, y) = φ0 + 812…”
Section: Depolarization Toward the Radio Relicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the observation of depolarisation in Figure 4 at the location of the hot spot makes it immediately evident that it will be necessary to involve more complex models in order to accurately describe at least some of the observed polarisation. There are typically three mechanisms that can lead to depolarisation, all of which are presented with complete discussion in Sokoloff et al (1998) and references therein, and all we briefly outline below.…”
Section: Polarisation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%