1971
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depolarization of the tooth pulp afferent terminals in the brain stem of the cat

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Tooth pulp afferent fibres belonging exclusively to the AA group were stimulated bi-polarly with electrical pulses applied to the dentine and the central effects of the stimulation were examined in the nucleus of the spinal trigeminal complex of anaesthetized cats.2. Field potentials evoked by single pulses to the upper or lower canine tooth pulp were explored over the nucleus of the spinal trigeminal tract in the region 5 mm caudally to the obex up to 8-5 mm rostrally to the obex. They were found to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present findings of the tooth pulp afferent projection patterns in the trigeminal sensory nucleus are consistent with previous anatomic (see references in the introductory section) and electrophysiological studies (Davies et al, 1971;Yokota, 1975;Greenwood and Sessle, 1976;Sessle and Greenwood, 1976;Shigenaga et al, 1976;Vyklicky et al, 1977;Woda et al, 1977;Dawson et al, 1980;Azerad et al, 1982;Dostrovski, 1984), we have documented that their synaptic organization differs among the nuclei. It is well known that the tooth pulp is innervated by A-delta fibers that form a nerve plexus beneath the predentin and by unmyelinated (C-fiber) primary afferents that distribute around the center of tooth pulp (Sessle, 1987;Narhi, 1990;Narhi et al, 1994).…”
Section: Synaptic Organization Of Tooth Pulp Afferent Terminals In Trsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the present findings of the tooth pulp afferent projection patterns in the trigeminal sensory nucleus are consistent with previous anatomic (see references in the introductory section) and electrophysiological studies (Davies et al, 1971;Yokota, 1975;Greenwood and Sessle, 1976;Sessle and Greenwood, 1976;Shigenaga et al, 1976;Vyklicky et al, 1977;Woda et al, 1977;Dawson et al, 1980;Azerad et al, 1982;Dostrovski, 1984), we have documented that their synaptic organization differs among the nuclei. It is well known that the tooth pulp is innervated by A-delta fibers that form a nerve plexus beneath the predentin and by unmyelinated (C-fiber) primary afferents that distribute around the center of tooth pulp (Sessle, 1987;Narhi, 1990;Narhi et al, 1994).…”
Section: Synaptic Organization Of Tooth Pulp Afferent Terminals In Trsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The conduction velocity of tooth pulp afferents lies primarily within the A␦ range (Davies et al, 1971;Lisney, 1979;Dostrovsky et al, 1981;Cairns et al, 1996). The present results indicate that the magnitude of TGT neuronal responses to tooth pulp stimulation is suppressed during AS.…”
Section: State-dependent Changes In Peripherally Evoked Responsessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The orthodromic response, recorded bipolarly, was largest in amplitude in, or in the vicinity of, the subnucleus oralis of the spinal tract nucleus. In agreement with Davies et al (1971), the latency and duration of the response were about 2.0 and 5.0 msec, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%