“…By noting the European immigrant story, Michelle (erroneously) assumes a common experience among all racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S. (Takaki, 1993), implying that she, descended from someone with limited financial or cultural capital, has the same life chances as, say, an African-American descended from slaves. Michelle seems to simultaneously invoke the salience of race (her own) in order to dismiss its relevance today, a winding thought process that may speak to a belief in meritocratic colorblindness (Bonilla-Silva, 2010), a preference for discussing safer “cultural issues” over the harshness of racism (DiPardo & Fehn, 2000), a use of the “immigrant analogy” (Haney-López, 1994; Sleeter, 1995), or a reflection of the “not race” paradigm discussed earlier. Segall and Garrett (2013) found a similar phenomenon in their study of White teachers, noting that such embedded denials, contradictions, and changes of course highlight how “white teachers do not avoid race issues or skirt around them but, in fact, are quite fluent when they choose to engage them, using race to both discuss race and avoid discussion about it – often in the same move” (p. 20).…”