1999
DOI: 10.1094/cchem.1999.76.3.395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depolymerization of the Glutenin Macropolymer During Dough Mixing: I. Changes in Levels, Molecular Weight Distribution, and Overall Composition

Abstract: Cereal Chem. 76(3):395-401Changes in the amounts, molecular weight distributions, and levels of major groups of subunits in the glutenin macropolymer (GMP) of doughs during mixing were investigated. The GMP (gel protein) is the unreduced fraction of gluten protein that remains as a layer on top of the starch after extraction of SDS-soluble proteins and centrifugation. Experiments involved doughs prepared from flours derived from one weak and one strong cultivar and lines derived from cv. Olympic that were null… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
48
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with those of earlier research for bread dough (Weegels et al, 1997a,b;Lagrain et al, 2007) where an increase in SDS-EP content upon bread dough mixing was also reported. In this context, it is relevant to mention that Weegels et al (1997a,b) have suggested that partial depolymerisation of glutenin during dough mixing occurs, that Skerritt et al (1999) suggested breaking of disulphide bonds of the GMP during mixing and a subsequent formation of new SS-bonds with 'chain-terminating' polypeptides, that Don et al (2005) reported a transition of spherical glutenin particles in flour to disrupted, non-spherical glutenin particles in mixed dough, and that Lagrain et al (2007) ascribed the increase in SDS-EGLU contents upon mixing to mechanical disruption of glutenin and formation of protein aggregates from this partially disrupted glutenin through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Protein Extractability In Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Containing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with those of earlier research for bread dough (Weegels et al, 1997a,b;Lagrain et al, 2007) where an increase in SDS-EP content upon bread dough mixing was also reported. In this context, it is relevant to mention that Weegels et al (1997a,b) have suggested that partial depolymerisation of glutenin during dough mixing occurs, that Skerritt et al (1999) suggested breaking of disulphide bonds of the GMP during mixing and a subsequent formation of new SS-bonds with 'chain-terminating' polypeptides, that Don et al (2005) reported a transition of spherical glutenin particles in flour to disrupted, non-spherical glutenin particles in mixed dough, and that Lagrain et al (2007) ascribed the increase in SDS-EGLU contents upon mixing to mechanical disruption of glutenin and formation of protein aggregates from this partially disrupted glutenin through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Protein Extractability In Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Containing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During mixing or sheeting, the dough became more elastic, 9 and the solubility of glutenin proteins (the elastic protein component in gluten) increased due to protein disaggregation and depolymerization of the glutenin polymer. 10,14,15 Figure 3 shows changes in the distribution of glutenin proteins in the pasta during sheeting from 3 passes and 45 passes. We observed that with increasing sheeting passes the quantity of the SDS-soluble polymeric glutenin increased, with a concurrent decrease in the SDS-insoluble polymeric glutenin.…”
Section: Changes In Physicochemical Characteristics Of the Protein Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending of the mechanism (type of movement) and extension of the kneading process, the dough can become more or less elastic as a result of the conformation and integrity of the gluten matrix obtained (Hayta & Alpaslan, 2001;Morgenstern, Zheng, Ross, & Campanella, 1999;Skerritt, Hac, & Bekes, 1999;Sutton et al, 2003). The rupture stress and rupture strain of cooked samples are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Cooked Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%