1978
DOI: 10.13182/nse78-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition of Iron Oxide on Heated Surfaces in Boiling Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[92]. Similar results were later obtained in a natural circulation loop operating at a pressure of 10 atm.…”
Section: Impact Of Boiling On Rate Of Particulate Foulingsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[92]. Similar results were later obtained in a natural circulation loop operating at a pressure of 10 atm.…”
Section: Impact Of Boiling On Rate Of Particulate Foulingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…degree of sub-cooling decreases, bubble lifetimes decrease and microlayer evaporation is the dominant process, giving rise to disk-shaped deposits. This hypothesis may offer a means to reconcile the apparently divergent conclusions of Wen and Melandres [97] (who investigated bubble formation in a non-flowing system) with those of Asakura et al [92,93] regarding the relative importance of microlayer evaporation and particle-bubble interactions with respect to the mechanism of particle deposition in boiling water.…”
Section: Investigations Of Particle-bubble Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a result of careful observation of the crud deposition process and analogy to heat transfer models under nuclear boiling, a microlayer evaporation and dry out model has been developed to analyze crud deposition under boiling at BWR fuel surfaces [57].…”
Section: Crud and Ion Deposition On Fuel Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial flow rate or mass flux must therefore decrease as the flow resistance increases with time due to growth of a deposit that encroaches on the flow channel. The flow rate reduction then continues until two-phase instability occurs [9]. Note that there will probably be some redistribution of pressure losses with t h e over the various components of the flow path (e.g., the downcomer annulus versus the supports), but this is a second-order effect.…”
Section: Area Change Hpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, instead of the flow area ratio tenn Cc used in Equation 9.10, the support porosity p , , is used. Brup represents the ratio of support flow area to free-span flow area; ) is therefore the ratio of support cross-sectional area to k -s p a n flow are* and is taken to (approximately) quai the h c t i o n of the particles that would be subject to deposition ont0 the top surface of supportBecause sticking is already accounted for, KG and Kc are not subject to limitation by KA, and are therefore treated independently from the classic transport-attachment model.…”
Section: Enhanced Demsition F?om Flow Develovment On Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%