Conducting research in much of the Global South often involves engagement with communities, groups and even field staff living and working in constrained material conditions. As researchers from the USA with field experience in East Africa, we consider in this paper various aspects of reciprocity, mutual benefit and ethical engagement between researcher, respondents, host communities, and staff. With a focus on three stakeholder groups, we explore the challenges and rewards of implementing an ethical exchange of information, gifts and mentorship as well as the nuances of negotiating and articulating responsibilities and expectations. We offer general guidance informed by personal experiences to elucidate these lessons, their impacts on the outcomes of the research, and the implicit ethics behind mindful reciprocity as academics.
IntroductionWhile literature on the ethics of research is on the rise, this work tends to focus on the ethical obligations of researchers to participants during data collection and often neglects the ethical considerations of the researcher's presence in the field, of field staff and their relationship with participants, and responsibilities to participants after data collection. This article considers a thoughtful and compassionate sympatric relationship (hereafter mindful reciprocity) between the researcher, study communities and field staff. The intent is to advance our attentiveness to power imbalances that influence the quality of the data we collect and may serve as an opportunity for meaningful and beneficial exchange, as others have suggested (Massey, 2004;Robinson, 1999).We begin the paper with a discussion of 'mindful hiring' and the nuances of negotiating and articulating responsibilities and expectations. This requires attention to hierarchies of power in locations with staggering unemployment and our place within that system. Secondly, host communities are critical stakeholders in the processes of research. We share ways field staff 'gave back' to communities from our own experiences in the field. We close the paper by discussing the ethical and emotional challenges of working directly with respondents. The intensity of these challenges is evidenced through the profound relationships that emerge between both researchers and staff with respondents. Throughout, we provide examples of our own experience. In particular we explore how the practice of mindful reciprocity