2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-02002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression and loneliness during April 2020 COVID-19 restrictions in the United States, and their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
90
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also associated with financial concerns and worries about the impact of prolonged quarantine as well as feelings of fear and uncertainty, increased depression, anxiety, stress, and an increased affective response to different aspect of the pandemic in Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States (Brooks et al, 2020;Holmes et al, 2020;Jia et al, 2020;Kantor and Kantor, 2020;Killgore et al, 2020;Okruszek et al, 2020;Smith and Lim, 2020;Son et al, 2020;Cacioppo et al, 2021). Studies indicate that more frequent faceto-face contacts (unlike remote or virtual interactions), as well as closeness and quality of relationships moderate the negative loneliness-inducing influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and function as protective factors (Bu et al, 2020a,b;Groarke et al, 2020;Li and Wang, 2020;Tull et al, 2020;Rosenberg et al, 2021). Close, frequent and satisfying relationships constitute a basic human need and are core indicators of the social aspect of wellbeing (Baumeister and Leary, 1995;Ryan and Deci, 2000;Seligman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also associated with financial concerns and worries about the impact of prolonged quarantine as well as feelings of fear and uncertainty, increased depression, anxiety, stress, and an increased affective response to different aspect of the pandemic in Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States (Brooks et al, 2020;Holmes et al, 2020;Jia et al, 2020;Kantor and Kantor, 2020;Killgore et al, 2020;Okruszek et al, 2020;Smith and Lim, 2020;Son et al, 2020;Cacioppo et al, 2021). Studies indicate that more frequent faceto-face contacts (unlike remote or virtual interactions), as well as closeness and quality of relationships moderate the negative loneliness-inducing influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and function as protective factors (Bu et al, 2020a,b;Groarke et al, 2020;Li and Wang, 2020;Tull et al, 2020;Rosenberg et al, 2021). Close, frequent and satisfying relationships constitute a basic human need and are core indicators of the social aspect of wellbeing (Baumeister and Leary, 1995;Ryan and Deci, 2000;Seligman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Estimates within the general (US) population during the COVID-19 pandemic have suggested that up to a third of people may be experiencing substantial depressive symptomology (using the CES-D-10 scale). 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loneliness has been defined as the embodiment of social isolation and can show an individual's negative feelings about the frequency and closeness of their social contacts (Steptoe et al, 2013 ). In addition, loneliness has been associated with increased levels of depressive symptoms (Cacioppo et al, 2006 ; Matthews et al, 2016 ; Palgi et al, 2020 ; Rosenberg et al, 2020 ), increased symptoms of anxiety (Ernst and Cacioppo, 1999 ; Cacioppo et al, 2006 ; Okruszek et al, 2020 ; Palgi et al, 2020 ), and an altered mood state (Loucks, 1980 ; Besser et al, 2020 ). Prolonged time at home, loneliness (Page and Hammermeister, 1995 ; Hawkley et al, 2009 ; Richard et al, 2017 ; Schrempft et al, 2019 ; Creese et al, 2020 ), and mental health disturbances (Mayou et al, 2000 ; Brummett et al, 2003 ; Stewart et al, 2003 ; Van Gool et al, 2003 ; Allan et al, 2007 ; Da Silva et al, 2012 ; Legey et al, 2017 ; Stubbs et al, 2017 ; Creese et al, 2020 ; López-Bueno et al, 2020 ; Stanton et al, 2020 ) can increase behaviors that promote sedentary behavior and decrease overall physical activity (Biddle, 2016 ; Creese et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%