“…To date, little quantitative research relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people has measured participation in the unique sociocultural contexts for aging. Instead, quantitative research has tended to report on the individual and societal burdens of aging, with a focus on the characteristics and prevalence of individual physical and biological dimensions such as dementia and cognitive impairment ( Derrig et al, 2020 ; Hocking et al, 2019 ; Lavrencic et al, 2019 ; Radford et al, 2017 ; Russell et al, 2021 ; Smith et al, 2008 ), disability and frailty ( Gubhaju et al, 2015 ; Hyde et al, 2016 , 2019 ; Lo Giudice et al, 2012 ; Lukaszyk et al, 2018 ; Wong et al, 2013 ), incontinence ( Lo Giudice et al, 2012 ; Smith et al, 2019 ), chronic disease ( McKercher et al, 2014 ; McNamara et al, 2014 ; Toelle et al, 2013 ), psychological distress ( Almeida et al, 2014 ; Mate et al, 2020 ; Rowland et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2018 ; Temple, Kelaher, et al, 2020 ), smoking ( Thurber et al, 2021 ), and the broader demographics of population aging ( Lo Giudice et al, 2012 ; Temple, Wilson, et al, 2020 ). Although there is increasing research that reports on narrowly defined aspects of Aboriginal sociocultural livelihoods including studies that describe racism ( Temple et al, 2019 ; Temple, Kelaher, et al, 2020 ), access to aged care and health services ( Larke et al, 2020 ), medications and vaccine equity ( Dyda et al, 2019 ; Page et al, 2019 ), the role of Aboriginal people as grandparents ( Gibberd et al, 2020 ), childhood adversity and stress ( Radford et al, 2017 ), and self-reported good health ( Lavrencic et al, 2020 ), there remains a gap in quantitative data contributing to a comprehensive picture of the sociocultural lives of older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander older people.…”