2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-011-9286-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deprogramming: from private self-help to governmental organized repression

Abstract: This paper examines deprogramming, a multi-faceted form of derecruitment from unpopular religious groups ("cults") developed in the United States and then spreading to other nations, as a form of social control of new religious movements. The early history of deprogramming in the United States is discussed, and then its more recent application in Japan against members of the Unification Church is detailed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The epitome of coercion in religious exit narratives is found not in accounts about leaving voluntarily but in those about the forcible removal of individuals from religious or spiritual groups. A key arena for considering this has been "deprogramming" (Bromley 1988;Richardson 2011), a cold-war concept deriving from the idea that people could be "brainwashed" or programmed by groups or states deemed dangerous by mainstream society (McCloud 2004). From the 1970s to the 1990s, especially in the US, deprogramming involved kidnapping or other methods of abduction of "brainwashed" sons and daughters from "cults", followed by a process of thoughtreform or re-education.…”
Section: The Social Nature Of Religious Unlearning: Agency and Coercionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epitome of coercion in religious exit narratives is found not in accounts about leaving voluntarily but in those about the forcible removal of individuals from religious or spiritual groups. A key arena for considering this has been "deprogramming" (Bromley 1988;Richardson 2011), a cold-war concept deriving from the idea that people could be "brainwashed" or programmed by groups or states deemed dangerous by mainstream society (McCloud 2004). From the 1970s to the 1990s, especially in the US, deprogramming involved kidnapping or other methods of abduction of "brainwashed" sons and daughters from "cults", followed by a process of thoughtreform or re-education.…”
Section: The Social Nature Of Religious Unlearning: Agency and Coercionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that not all state responses have been grounded in cases of religious violence. In the past two decades, the Chinese government has adopted from Euro-American discourses and legal categorisations of officially sanctioned 'religions' and illegal 'cults' (xie jiao, translated as 'evil cult') to crack down on minority religions including the Falun Gong and the Church of Almighty God (Edelman and Richardson 2005;Irons 2018;Richardson 2011;Yang 2012).…”
Section: State Responses -Aum and The Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces éléments relevés dans la littérature à propos des NMR (captivité, modalités de contrôle, abus, soumission et obéissance) sont rendus possibles en fonction de ce qui a été nommé « lavage de cerveau » (Richardson, 2011). D'une façon générale, le processus de « brainwashing » peut être opérationnalisé en trois étapes : 1) déstructuration de l'identité ; 2) introduction et identification aux normes et valeurs du NMR ; 3) mort symbolique et renaissance (Zablocki, dans Zablocki et Robbins, 2001, pp.…”
Section: Cadre Théorique Et Analytiqueunclassified