2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deproteinated Cheese Whey Medium for Biomass Production of Probiotic Lactobacillus helveticus MTCC 5463

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with MRSB media or positive control, the number of bacterial cells growing on cheese whey media was less but not significantly different. This is the same as the research of Salma et al [26] which showed the highest average number of Lactobacillus helveticus MTCC 5463 cells was in MRSB media at 9.12 log CFU/mL, followed by skim milk media at 9.03 log CFU/mL, and cheese whey media at 9.02 log CFU/mL. The number of bacteria that grows on cheese whey is less because the nutritional content in it is reduced.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…When compared with MRSB media or positive control, the number of bacterial cells growing on cheese whey media was less but not significantly different. This is the same as the research of Salma et al [26] which showed the highest average number of Lactobacillus helveticus MTCC 5463 cells was in MRSB media at 9.12 log CFU/mL, followed by skim milk media at 9.03 log CFU/mL, and cheese whey media at 9.02 log CFU/mL. The number of bacteria that grows on cheese whey is less because the nutritional content in it is reduced.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This could be due to the CWP composition (salts, proteins and small amounts of vitamins) that could have a positive effect on the biomass production. There are few reports on the production of yeast biomass from CWP as a substrate (Barba et al, 2001;Bosso et al, 2020;Prajapati et al, 2017). The biomass yield coefficient (Y X/S ) obtained in this work (0.44-0.77 g B /g S ) was similar or better than those reported previously in literature, with different carbon and nitrogen sources (Ariyanti & Hadiyanto, 2013;Fonseca et al, 2007;Kurniawati et al, 2022;Bosso et al, 2019;Ferrari et al, 2001;Cristiani-Urbina et al, 2000;Schnierda et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As a result, the medium optimized with CWP is a suitable culture medium to produce a valuable product such as yeast biomass. CWP is an excellent source of functional proteins, peptides, lipids, vitamins, minerals, and lactose (Bosso et al, 2020;Prajapati et al, 2017;Ryan & Walsh, 2016;Vamvakaki et al, 2010). In addition, some authors demonstrated that the addition of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and KH 2 PO 4 increased biomass yield and biomass production (Cristiani-Urbina et al, 2000;Galvagno et al, 2011;Vamvakaki et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food industry waste and by-product streams have been previously used for LAB biomass production [ 40 ]. Likewise, L. plantarum and L. pentosus constitute two of the most extensively employed species [ 30 , 41 , 42 ]. Several reports have evidenced the successful implementation of CW for the proliferation and growth of LAB [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers also report the necessity to implement synthetic exogenous sources, to boost microbial growth, achieving cell growth equal or higher than that of synthetic substrates [ 8 , 45 ]. For instance, Prajapati et al [ 42 ] presented whey fermentation by L. helveticus using additional nitrogen sources, e.g., peptone and yeast extract, leading to 3.25 g/L biomass production. Similar findings have also been reported, with L. casei in whey, demonstrating significant lactose conversion (95.62%) and lactic acid production (33.73 g/L) [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%