1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0032062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth adjacency and cue effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large differences in disparity for adjacent elements seem to be critical. This supports the findings of Gogel (1956Gogel ( , 1972 and Gulick and Lawson (1976), that the depth response is to relative disparity and depends on local depth differences. Our results indicate an important role for such local depth differences in surface perception, namely, that the resolution of local depth at the boundary of a surface can extend to de- tails across the surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Large differences in disparity for adjacent elements seem to be critical. This supports the findings of Gogel (1956Gogel ( , 1972 and Gulick and Lawson (1976), that the depth response is to relative disparity and depends on local depth differences. Our results indicate an important role for such local depth differences in surface perception, namely, that the resolution of local depth at the boundary of a surface can extend to de- tails across the surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The situation in which the rod was displaced in front of the single far frame, but less clearly the situation in which the rod was displaced behind the single near frame, also provides support for a factor of depth adjacency. The results from Experiment I parallel those obtained from induced motion (Gogel & Koslow, 1971, 1972 and from induced size (Gogel. 1974).…”
Section: Experiments Nsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…, 1974(Gogel. , 1975Gogel & Koslow, 1971, 1972Green. Lawson, & Godek, 1972;Wist, 1974;Wist & Susen, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
The main object of this study was a possible induction effect, in the sense meant, for example, by Gogel (1972). More precisely, it was a depth induction effect, since the crucial aspects that we considered in both its inducing and test components were related to perceptual depththe third dimension of perceptual space.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%