2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10801-016-0683-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth in classical Coxeter groups

Abstract: The depth statistic was defined by Petersen and Tenner for an element of an arbitrary Coxeter group in terms of factorizations of the element into a product of reflections. It can also be defined as the minimal cost, given certain prescribed edge weights, for a path in the Bruhat graph from the identity to an element. We present algorithms for calculating the depth of an element of a classical Coxeter group that yield simple formulas for this statistic. We use our algorithms to characterize elements having dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i ρ, β ∨ i : x = s β1 • • • s β k , β i ∈ Φ + }. (8.1)Following[2], we say that the W -depth of x is realized by a reduced factorization of x if there existsan expression x = s β1 • • • s β k with β i ∈ Φ + , such that ℓ(x) = k i=1 ℓ(s βi ) and dp(x) = k i=1dp(s βi ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…i ρ, β ∨ i : x = s β1 • • • s β k , β i ∈ Φ + }. (8.1)Following[2], we say that the W -depth of x is realized by a reduced factorization of x if there existsan expression x = s β1 • • • s β k with β i ∈ Φ + , such that ℓ(x) = k i=1 ℓ(s βi ) and dp(x) = k i=1dp(s βi ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2, Proposition 6.6] If the W -depth of x is realized by a reduced factorization then dp(x) = 1 2 (ℓ(x) + ℓ red (x)); in particular, this equality holds whenever W is a classical finite Coxeter group. Relation between wt and dp.Lemma 8.4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6], the authors considered the situation in which S n is generated by the set T = {(i j)} of all transpositions, and the cost function on transpositions is given by (1) $((i j)) = |j − i|, i.e., the cost of a transposition is equal to the distance between the points it transposes in the one-line notation of a permutation. They showed that for this function, the cost of a permutation is half of its total displacement:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shallow permutations have another surprising connection not previously noted in the literature. Given a permutation w, Bagno, Biagioli, Novick, and the last author [4] defined the reduced reflection length ℓ R (w) as the smallest integer q such that there exist i 1 , . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%