2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2016.7899832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth map upsampling by self-guided residual interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the proposed method with the following three method categories: 1) the single-frame depth image upsampling approach including general image upsampling methods: bicubic interpolation, self-guided residual interpolation (SG) [9], edge-guided upsampling (EG) [10], and SRCNN [11]; 2) the intensity-guided depth upsampling approach: guided image filtering (GF) [12], fast global image smoothing (FGI) [15], robust color guided restoration (RCG) [16], and joint local structure and nonlocal low-rank regularization (LN) [17]; and 3) the multi-frame depth image SR approach: robust SR (RSR) [20] based on the BTV model, combination SR (CSR) using sparse and non-sparse priors [23], and multiframe ToF SR (MTSR) [25] based on the TV model. The implementations from the publicly available codes provided by the authors and appropriate parameters were used in our experiments.…”
Section: B Compared Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the proposed method with the following three method categories: 1) the single-frame depth image upsampling approach including general image upsampling methods: bicubic interpolation, self-guided residual interpolation (SG) [9], edge-guided upsampling (EG) [10], and SRCNN [11]; 2) the intensity-guided depth upsampling approach: guided image filtering (GF) [12], fast global image smoothing (FGI) [15], robust color guided restoration (RCG) [16], and joint local structure and nonlocal low-rank regularization (LN) [17]; and 3) the multi-frame depth image SR approach: robust SR (RSR) [20] based on the BTV model, combination SR (CSR) using sparse and non-sparse priors [23], and multiframe ToF SR (MTSR) [25] based on the TV model. The implementations from the publicly available codes provided by the authors and appropriate parameters were used in our experiments.…”
Section: B Compared Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous attempts have been made to overcome the physical limitations of ToF sensors, such as their limited spatial resolution. Algorithms for improving the depth image resolution of ToF sensors can be categorized into three groups, which are described as follows: The first approach is singleframe depth upsampling, which aims to recover a highresolution (HR) image from a single low-resolution (LR) image [9], [10]. Such methods generally use the statistical characteristics inside the depth image or those of the training images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the quantitative evaluation metric, we used structural similarity (SSIM) [35] since it can predict human perception of image quality. Similar to Konno et al [36], the standard deviation of Gaussian function in SSIM was set to 4 so that it can evaluate the similarity of semiglobal structure. The higher SSIM value shows a better performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural similarity (SSIM) [38] is used for performance evaluation since it can predict human perception of image quality. The standard deviation of SSIM in the experiments is set to 4 so as to evaluate the similarity of semi-global structure [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%