2004
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200406002-00137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: a clinical study comparing BIS and AAI during heart surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shepherd et al [33], made a study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BIS, E-Entropy and Narcotrend by comparing each one with standard clinical monitoring, to monitor the DoA in surgical patients undergoing the general anaesthesia. Tiren et al [38], made a clinical study in which the BIS and Entropy monitoring were compared in patients undergoing heart surgery. Their results showed that the BIS indicated deep anaesthesia more accurately than entropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shepherd et al [33], made a study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BIS, E-Entropy and Narcotrend by comparing each one with standard clinical monitoring, to monitor the DoA in surgical patients undergoing the general anaesthesia. Tiren et al [38], made a clinical study in which the BIS and Entropy monitoring were compared in patients undergoing heart surgery. Their results showed that the BIS indicated deep anaesthesia more accurately than entropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34,35]. Most of the feature extraction methods were related to using a Fourier transform or a Wavelet transform to pull out the key characteristics of EEG signals [36][37][38]. Those techniques mainly aim to reduce the dimensionality of the EEG data and increase the accuracy of the DoA estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%