Depth of experiencing and therapeutic alliance: What predicts outcome for whom in emotion‐focused therapy for trauma?

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which therapeutic processes – working alliance and depth of experiencing – contributed to outcome. Method Individual differences in these processes were examined at the early and working phases to determine their impact on symptom reduction. An archival data set of N = 42 individuals who underwent emotion‐focused therapy for trauma for childhood maltreatment was used to examine the differential quality of client processes throughout treatment. Results For those who had difficulty forming an alliance early in therapy, alliance scores during the working phase were the best predictor of outcome (β = −.42). This was complemented by a process change of improvement in alliance from the early to working phases (d = 1.0). In contrast, for those who had difficulty engaging in deepened experiencing early in therapy, depth of experiencing in the working phase was the best predictor of outcome (β = −.36). This was complemented by an improvement in depth of experiencing from the early to working phases (d = .69). Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that focusing on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy contributes to the best treatment outcome. Practitioner points Sometimes early treatment sessions reveal an abundance of one kind of processing but limitations to another, which poses a puzzle for treatment planning. Our findings suggest that within the first four sessions, therapists could develop tailored treatments based on the relative presence or absence of critical therapeutic changes processes. When it becomes evident that therapy is progressing with a weaker alliance between client and therapist, therapists should redouble their efforts in alliance‐building. However, when therapy is developing in a fashion that lacks deep emotional experiencing on the part of the client, treatment efforts should aim to facilitate a richer exploration of moment‐by‐moment experience. As such, our findings suggest relying on the existing processing strengths within a dyad (e.g., emphasis on an already strong relationships, or augmenting an existing aptitude for deeper experiencing) while shortcomings exist in another kind of process is not optimal responding. Therapists should focus their work on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy to facilitate the best treatment outcome.

Qualitative Analysis of Chair Tasks in Emotion-Focused Therapy Video Sessions

“…Hence, clients were seeing the therapist for the first time in a recording studio. This supports the notion that emotion transformation is based on a strong therapeutic alliance and evolves over time [80,81]. When clients start feeling stronger and more resilient, they start standing up for themselves.…”

Emotion-focused therapy.

“…Among participants receiving either EFT or client-centered therapy, Pos et al (2017) found that depth of experiencing mediated the impact of emotional arousal on treatment outcome. In EFT for trauma, when clients struggled early in treatment to achieve greater depth of experiencing, depth of experiencing (in the working phase) was the best predictor of treatment outcome (Harrington et al, 2021). Conversely, for clients with an initially poor working alliance, the quality of alliance (in the working phase) was the best predictor of treatment outcome (Harrington et al, 2021).…”

“…In EFT for trauma, when clients struggled early in treatment to achieve greater depth of experiencing, depth of experiencing (in the working phase) was the best predictor of treatment outcome (Harrington et al, 2021). Conversely, for clients with an initially poor working alliance, the quality of alliance (in the working phase) was the best predictor of treatment outcome (Harrington et al, 2021). Client experiencing has emerged as another key process predictor of outcome, particularly for clients who struggle to engage with emotion and make meaning.…”