2014
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management

Abstract: Soil invertebrates, mammals, and plants penetrate and exploit the surface soil layer (i.e., the biologically active zone) to varying depths. As the US Department of Energy remediates radioactive and hazardous wastes in soil at the Hanford Site, a site-specific definition of the biologically active zone is needed to identify the depth to which remedial actions should be taken to protect the environment and avoid excessive cleanup expenditures. This definition may then be considered in developing a point of comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Fan et al () found that many studies did not ascertain maximum rooting depth, because “in most cases, the maximum rooting depth recorded is the depth of the investigation, such as the depth of the trench or the soil core, and they are clearly under‐estimates of the true maximum rooting depths.” We found this to hold true for many of the root studies at the Hanford Site, cited by Sample et al (). For example, Waugh et al (), who recorded some of the greatest bitterbrush root depths at Hanford Site, dug 2.5‐m (8.2‐ft) pits using a backhoe and noted that bitterbrush roots penetrated deeper than this depth (and in one case, much deeper), “but sloughing sand from the drying walls of the trench inhibited further digging.”…”
Section: Rooting Trendssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, Fan et al () found that many studies did not ascertain maximum rooting depth, because “in most cases, the maximum rooting depth recorded is the depth of the investigation, such as the depth of the trench or the soil core, and they are clearly under‐estimates of the true maximum rooting depths.” We found this to hold true for many of the root studies at the Hanford Site, cited by Sample et al (). For example, Waugh et al (), who recorded some of the greatest bitterbrush root depths at Hanford Site, dug 2.5‐m (8.2‐ft) pits using a backhoe and noted that bitterbrush roots penetrated deeper than this depth (and in one case, much deeper), “but sloughing sand from the drying walls of the trench inhibited further digging.”…”
Section: Rooting Trendssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Considerations for remediation and restoration are not the same for all waste sites. Regarding depth of the biologically active zone (and specifically plant rooting depths), a more conservative approach is needed at the Hanford Site, relative to that proposed by Sample et al (). In particular, we support the current standard point of compliance depth of 457 cm (15 ft), specified in our state MTCA regulation, as a reasonable strategy to accommodate the uncertainty and variability inherent in vertically characterizing a biologically active zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Native grasses are also present, including Poa secunda (sandberg bluegrass; <1% cover), Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass; <1% cover), and Stipa comate (needle‐and‐thread grass; <1% cover). Based on previous measurements performed within the Hanford Area, the maximum rooting depths of the shrub species are 2.5 m or shallower (Sample et al, ). At this site, the soil texture in the top 30 cm is loamy sand (5% clay, 11% silt, and 84% sand), and the soil texture in the layer from 30 to 45 cm is sand (2% clay, 4% silt, and 94% sand).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%