2014
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.53.091301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth profiles of the nickel donor center in p-type silicon diffused with dilute nickel measured by deep-level transient spectroscopy

Abstract: The depth profiles of the nickel donor center located at E v + 0.17 eV (E v : the top energy of the valence band) in p-type silicon diffused with dilute nickel at 525-900 °C and slowly cooled to room temperature were measured. Owing to the domination of the fast outdiffusion of nickel, the nickel center concentration at the sample surface was highest for the sample diffused at 525 °C, which abruptly decreased with increasing diffusion temperature. The concentrations of the center in the samples diffused at int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since sound diodes were always formed without etching the surfaces of the samples, no nickel precipitate was considered to form on the surfaces of the samples; all the contaminating nickel was dissolved in the bulk and no outdiffusion of the element occurred during the cooling of the samples. As reported in a previous paper, 24) the depth distribution of the nickel center was almost homogeneous throughout the depth (from 2.0 × 10 13 near the surface to 1.5 × 10 13 =cm 3 deep in the bulk). Since the bulk concentration of nickel is 3.8 × 10 14 =cm 3 when all the contaminating nickel homogeneously dissolves, the concentration fractions of the nickel center to the dissolved nickel are estimated to be from 4 to 5%.…”
Section: Spectrum Change After Long-time Storage At Room Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since sound diodes were always formed without etching the surfaces of the samples, no nickel precipitate was considered to form on the surfaces of the samples; all the contaminating nickel was dissolved in the bulk and no outdiffusion of the element occurred during the cooling of the samples. As reported in a previous paper, 24) the depth distribution of the nickel center was almost homogeneous throughout the depth (from 2.0 × 10 13 near the surface to 1.5 × 10 13 =cm 3 deep in the bulk). Since the bulk concentration of nickel is 3.8 × 10 14 =cm 3 when all the contaminating nickel homogeneously dissolves, the concentration fractions of the nickel center to the dissolved nickel are estimated to be from 4 to 5%.…”
Section: Spectrum Change After Long-time Storage At Room Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since DLTS is a sensitive and speciesdiscriminating probe, it is useful to assess the trace contamination of nickel in silicon, as demonstrated in a previous study. 24) It is also important to investigate the thermal behavior of the center and other nickel-related species after the diffusion of nickel for the actual assessment of nickel contamination. Several measurements reporting the annealing behavior of the center in heavily nickeldiffused samples 15,[17][18][19] and in a melt-doped sample 20) were reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the nickel donor level was predominantly formed during crystal growth with a higher boron doping concentration. When boron doping concentration is increased, the Fermi level is lowered and becomes closer to the nickel donor level (E V + 0.17 eV at room temperature), 8,21,22 which is slightly shallower than the Fermi level at the given doping density (E F = E V + 0.2-0.3 eV). Therefore, it is obvious that the formation of electrically active interstitial nickel (Ni int ) in a higher doping concentration starts at a higher temperature than in a lower doping concentration under the same cooling process, thus the formation of Ni-B pair is enhanced and the bulk nickel concentration after crystallization is also increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…17 However, most of these studies considered wafer samples that are contaminated from the surface and in-diffused at a certain temperature [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or doped during float-zone (FZ) growth. 21,22 These experimental conditions are a good approximation for the surface contamination of nickel, but they cannot reflect the exact behavior of nickel that appears during the CZ-Si growth process, which is accompanied with other impurities such as dopants and the formation of secondary defects during the subsequent wafering process. Moreover, the extremely fast quenching rate of approximately 2000 K • s −1 for generating nickel precipitates in several studies [11][12][13][14] never arises in the actual large-diameter CZ-Si ingot growth process; therefore, this experimental condition cannot be used to determine the actual advantages and disadvantages of nickel silicide precipitated during singlecrystal production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the diffusing temperature, most of the diffused nickel dissolves as interstitial Ni (Ni i ) and several to 10% of it forms Ni s 22) through a reaction with the N-V complex(B), and these nickel species are considered to be homogeneously distributed throughout the bulk of the sample. 22) During the cooling process, Ni i atoms rapidly out-diffuse and form precipitates at the sample surface. 27) While Ni i is known as the fastest diffuser, 28) Ni s is immobile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%