1978
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(78)90838-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth profiling of deuterium implanted into stainless steel at room temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion profiles are obtained by nuclear reaction analysis (NRA). This is a technique which has been used for many years in the surface analysis of materials but only recently , has it been applied to polymer studies. It is a straightforward nondestructive measurement technique enabling good depth profiling (up to 8 μm with a resolution of 400 nm using a 2 MeV beam normal to the sample surface) and resolution (down to 15 nm using a 0.7 MeV beam at a glancing angle of 15°).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion profiles are obtained by nuclear reaction analysis (NRA). This is a technique which has been used for many years in the surface analysis of materials but only recently , has it been applied to polymer studies. It is a straightforward nondestructive measurement technique enabling good depth profiling (up to 8 μm with a resolution of 400 nm using a 2 MeV beam normal to the sample surface) and resolution (down to 15 nm using a 0.7 MeV beam at a glancing angle of 15°).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is indeed a large uncertainty in the value at the maximum of the cross-section. It differs by as much as 30% depending on the authors [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The results obtained by the coincidence technique show that the profile at depth over 1 lm can be resolved at a scale of 0.1 lm with a 3 He detection limit close to 0.01 at.% in 3 He implanted UO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(1), using the cross section fit from Ref. [12]. The integral of the cross section over the relevant energy range differs only by a few percent compared to the more recent measurement [13] and results in a deuterium to carbon ratio of c D =c C ¼ 0:051Á Y M D =Y M C , with Y M D being the yield in the deuterium peak of Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%