2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.01779
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth Quality-Inspired Feature Manipulation for Efficient RGB-D Salient Object Detection

Abstract: RGB-D salient object detection (SOD) recently has attracted increasing research interest by benefiting conventional RGB SOD with extra depth information. However, existing RGB-D SOD models often fail to perform well in terms of both efficiency and accuracy, which hinders their potential applications on mobile devices and real-world problems. An underlying challenge is that the model accuracy usually degrades when the model is simplified to have few parameters. To tackle this dilemma and also inspired by the fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 1700 samples from NJU2K and 800 samples from NLPR were used for training, and tests were performed on STERE, SIP, NLPR, LFSD, NJU2K, and RGBD135. The results of DQPFPNet were compared to those of 16 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, including C2DF [56], S2MA [33], JL-DCF [30], CoNet [57], UCNet [22], CIRNet [58], SSLSOD [59], cmMS [60], DANet [36], DCF [61], ATSA [62], DSA2F [63], PGAR [64], A2dele [37], MSal [65], and DFMNet [66], as shown in Table 1. The salient maps for the other models were derived from their released predictions, if available, or produced from their public code.…”
Section: Comparison To Sotasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 1700 samples from NJU2K and 800 samples from NLPR were used for training, and tests were performed on STERE, SIP, NLPR, LFSD, NJU2K, and RGBD135. The results of DQPFPNet were compared to those of 16 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, including C2DF [56], S2MA [33], JL-DCF [30], CoNet [57], UCNet [22], CIRNet [58], SSLSOD [59], cmMS [60], DANet [36], DCF [61], ATSA [62], DSA2F [63], PGAR [64], A2dele [37], MSal [65], and DFMNet [66], as shown in Table 1. The salient maps for the other models were derived from their released predictions, if available, or produced from their public code.…”
Section: Comparison To Sotasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the depth map can be utilized in three ways: early fusion (Peng et al 2014;Song et al 2017;Zhao et al 2020b), middle fusion (Feng et al 2016) and late fusion (Fan, Liu, and Sun 2014). According to the number of encoding streams, RGB-D SOD methods can divided into two-stream (Zhao et al 2019;Chen and Fu 2020;Fan et al 2020b;Liu, Zhang, and Han 2020;Zhang et al 2020aZhang et al , 2021bSun et al 2021;Ji et al 2021a) and singlestream (Zhao et al 2020b)…”
Section: Rgb-d Salient Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fair comparisons, the proposed algorithm is compared with 16 state-of-the-art methods that have released codes, including S2MA (Liu, Zhang, and Han 2020), DANet (Zhao et al 2020b), CMW (Li et al 2020), BBS (Fan et al 2020b), CoNet (Ji et al 2020), UCNet (Zhang et al 2020a), PGAR (Chen and Fu 2020), HDF (Pang et al 2020a), CDNet (Jin et al 2021), DFM (Zhang et al 2021b), DSA2F (Sun et al 2021), DCF (Ji et al 2021a) and HAI (Li et al 2021a). Saliency maps of these competitors are directly provided by their respective authors or computed by their released codes.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation