2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depuration kinetics and tissue disposition of PFOA and PFOS in white leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus) administered by subcutaneous implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The crude nutrients of PFAA-contaminated corn silage were comparable with those of PFAA-free corn silage (Table 1). Crude ash content of PFAA-contaminated corn silage was not increased (\8 %); therefore, adhesion of soil causing high PFAA In the present study, sheep exposure to PFOA and PFOS by way of ''natural'' contaminated feed was 10-to 100-fold less than those used for kinetic studies with chicken NA not analysed (Yeung et al 2009;Yoo et al 2007) and rats (Vanden Heuvel et al 1991;Cui et al 2010). Comparison of plasma concentrations in wildlife found similar mean concentrations of PFOA and PFOS, ranging from 0.3 to 8 lg/L PFOA and from 0.8 to 74 lg/L PFOS, in panda from China (Dai et al 2006).…”
Section: Adsorption and Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The crude nutrients of PFAA-contaminated corn silage were comparable with those of PFAA-free corn silage (Table 1). Crude ash content of PFAA-contaminated corn silage was not increased (\8 %); therefore, adhesion of soil causing high PFAA In the present study, sheep exposure to PFOA and PFOS by way of ''natural'' contaminated feed was 10-to 100-fold less than those used for kinetic studies with chicken NA not analysed (Yeung et al 2009;Yoo et al 2007) and rats (Vanden Heuvel et al 1991;Cui et al 2010). Comparison of plasma concentrations in wildlife found similar mean concentrations of PFOA and PFOS, ranging from 0.3 to 8 lg/L PFOA and from 0.8 to 74 lg/L PFOS, in panda from China (Dai et al 2006).…”
Section: Adsorption and Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Those results support the idea that PFAS levels in eggs of the offshore species primarily reflect exposure during the 7 months/year to 8 months/ year both species spend on nonbreeding grounds rather than the 4 to 5 months/year that they spend at the breeding grounds [44], especially because nutrients in the eggs are deposited at the start of the breeding season, before they have several months' recent exposure. We suggest either that egg nutrients (including PFAS) are deposited at varying times after arriving from the nonbreeding grounds or that they are derived from tissues that have a longer PFAS half-life than the 14 to 20 days reported for some avian species [65] and may be similar to that seen in chicken serum [66]. However, clear differences are seen among the species; herons had the highest PFOS concentration, cormorants had the lowest concentrations of both dominant PFCAs, and the offshore species had the highest concentrations of dominant PFCAs.…”
Section: Species Differencesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…High PFOS concentrations in biotic samples were also observed in other studies in China, including in blood samples from giant pandas and red pandas [36] , and in human blood samples [11,12] . A recent exposure and depuration experiment on chickens showed that PFOA was removed from the body more quickly than PFOS [37] . Therefore, it is likely that PFOS accumulation would occur in chickens and that PFOS might be transferred to the eggs at high concentrations.…”
Section: Dietary Survey and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%