Der Benutzungsfragebogen ISONORM 9241/10: Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Validität

Prümper, Jochen

doi:10.1007/978-3-322-86782-7_21

Cited by 62 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…impossible locations. Using the rubber hand Animal and human brain studies have confirmed illusion, Ehrsson,Spence,and Passingham 21 this distinction between peripersonal and exhave recently studied the neuronal counterparts trapersonal space, showing that space is not 25,26 of the feeling of body ownership. On fMRI homogeneously represented in the brain.…”

Section: Cobbmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…In the last years, virtual the VR exposure, and the group that had alenvironments have often been used by several ready been exposed to altitude played on the research teams in Europe and the USA, to recomputer. search, for example, acrophobia (3,8), claustrophobia (4), arachnophobia (5) and fear of In a preliminary talk the therapeutic rationale flying (9,26,27,28). This technique is also used was discussed with the test persons.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cybertherapy 2005: A Decade of VR

Wiederhold¹

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed, and cbmpleting and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of infornation, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washingtorl Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information , 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithsitanding any other provision of law, no person shalt be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From -To) 01-07-2005 Final Proceedings About the journal ARCTT is a peer-reviewed all-purpose journal covering a wide variety of topics of interest to the mental health, neuroscience, and rehabilitation communities. The mission of ARCTT is to provide systematic, periodic examinations of scholarly advances in the field of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine through original investigations in the telemedicine and cybertherapy areas, novel experimental clinical studies, and critical authoritative reviews.It is directed to healthcare providers and researchers who are interested in the applications of advanced media for improving the delivery and efficacy of mental healthcare and rehabilitative services. Manuscript Proposal and SubmissionBecause Annual Review papers examine either novel therapeutic methods and trials or a specific clinical application in depth, they are written by experienced researchers upon invitation from our Editorial Board. The editors nevertheless welcome suggestions from our readers. Questions or comments about editorial content or policies should be directed to the editors only. Manuscript PreparationManuscripts should be submitted in electronic format on CD-Rom or floppy disks as well as on 8% x 11-in. paper (three copies), double-spaced format. Authors should prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5 Ed.).Original, camera-ready artwork for figures is required. Original color figures can be printed in color at the editors' discretion and provided the author agrees to pay in full the associated production costs; an estimate of these costs is available from the ARCTT production office on request.ARCTT policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications. Authors have an obligation to consult journal editors concerning prior publication of any data upon which their article depends. As this journal is a primary journal that publishes original material only, ARCHT policy prohibits as well publication of any manuscript that has already been published in wh...

show abstract

Section: Cobbmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybertherapy 2005: A Decade of VR

Wiederhold¹

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Suitability for individualization 7. Suitability for learning [29][30][31] and the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI), a usability questionnaire, which is mostly used for assessing new products during product evaluation, comparing products or versions of products and setting a goal for future application developments [32].…”

Section: Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…We therefore identified the following leading usability questionnaires including items, which refer to integration aspects, by a literature research: CUSQ [28], ISOMETRICS [29], ISONORM [30], and SUMI [32]. Starting from these questionnaires an item pool was constructed.…”

Section: Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Black Box Integration of Computer-Aided Diagnosis into PACS Deserves a Second Chance: Results of a Usability Study Concerning Bone Age Assessment

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Usability aspects of different integration concepts for picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) were inquired on the example of BoneXpert, a program determining the skeletal age from a left hand's radiograph. CAD-PACS integration was assessed according to its levels: data, function, presentation, and context integration focusing on usability aspects. A user-based study design was selected. Statements of seven experienced radiologists using two alternative types of integration provided by BoneXpert were acquired and analyzed using a mixed-methods approach based on think-aloud records and a questionnaire. In both variants, the CAD module (BoneXpert) was easily integrated in the workflow, found comprehensible and fitting in the conceptual framework of the radiologists. Weak points of the software integration referred to data and context integration. Surprisingly, visualization of intermediate image processing states (presentation integration) was found less important as compared to efficient handling and fast computation. Seamlessly integrating CAD into the PACS without additional work steps or unnecessary interrupts and without visualizing intermediate images may considerably improve software performance and user acceptance with efforts in time.

show abstract

“…The questionnaire is based on the seven ergonomic principles of ISO 9241-10, namely 1) suitability for the task, 2) self-descriptiveness, 3) controllability, 4) conformity with user expectations, 5) error tolerance, 6) suitability for individualization, and 7) suitability for learning. Utilizing these existing measures holds the advantage that they are tested for reliability and validity [39] and can be applied for software as well as for prototypes which have character or graphical interfaces [40]. In education, the questionnaire has already been successfully used by various researchers [e.g.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%