A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, SE Norway. III. Diversity and habitat niche relationships Rune H. Bkland Bkland, R. H. 1990. A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, SE Norway. 111. Diversity and habitat niche relationships. -Nord. J. Bot. 10: 191-220. Copenhagen. ISSN 0107-055X.Alpha and beta diversity and habitat niche relationships of a poor, boreal mire was studied, based upon an ordination by detrended correspondence analysis and a subjective classification. The three first DCA axes were interpreted as variation along the following ecoclines: (1) mire expanse carpetmire expanse hummockmire margin hummock, (2) nutrient status: ombrotrophicpoor minerotrophic, and as a coenocline (3) associated with peat-producing ability of the vegetation with an unclear ecological basis. The autecology of the 39 most frequent species was decribed with respect to these gradients. Alpha diversity patterns varied considerably between coenoclines. Beta diversity was always higher in the bottom layer than in the field layer. Habitat niche breadth was strongly correlated with species abundance, and separable into a frequency-independent and a frequency-dependent component. The former decreased from vascular plants to hepatics, and further to Sphagnum spp. It was argued that the importance of interactions was high in the bottom layer, particularly among Sphagnum spp., but also among hepatics. Interactions among vascular plants was considered unimportant, except in hummocks. Plant strategies were discussed. The niche breadth approach was evaluated, and found fruitful, while niche overlap was considered to provide redundant information. The importance of each of (1) interspecific interactions, (2) destabilizing factors, (3) stress, and (4) chance, as structuring factors in boreal mires, is discussed. Boreal mires are considered to conform to the patch-dynamics theory of non-equilibrium coexistence. ~ Accepted 7-12-1989 NORD. J. BOT. 10: 191-220. GEOB 035 0 NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY Nord. J. Bot. 10 (2) (IW) 13 N o d J . Bol. 10 (2) (1%)) 11' Nord. J. Rot. I0 ( 2 ) (IYYII) 196 Nurd. J. But. 10 (2) (IY'W))