2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-015-0338-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Einfluss schulrechtlicher Reformen auf Bildungsungleichheiten zwischen den deutschen Bundesländern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-ability pupils are allocated to the highest track (Gymnasium) and typically leave school after 12 or 13 years of schooling with an upper-secondary qualification, which allows them to enrol in university. The secondary track placement of children is based on the recommendation of primary school teachers and on the preference of parents (Jä hnen and Helbig, 2015). 1 The transition to secondary education is a crucial point in the educational trajectory of German youth.…”
Section: The German Education System and The Compulsory Schooling Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-ability pupils are allocated to the highest track (Gymnasium) and typically leave school after 12 or 13 years of schooling with an upper-secondary qualification, which allows them to enrol in university. The secondary track placement of children is based on the recommendation of primary school teachers and on the preference of parents (Jä hnen and Helbig, 2015). 1 The transition to secondary education is a crucial point in the educational trajectory of German youth.…”
Section: The German Education System and The Compulsory Schooling Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The relative importance of teacher recommendations and parental preferences for the secondary track placement of children varies across German states (Jä hnen and Helbig, 2015). 2 In Germany, education policy is in the hands of the individual Bundeslä nder, which generally coordinate their activities through framework agreements made by the Ministers of Culture Conference (Kultusministerkonferenz) (Mü ller et al, 1998).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases these environmental variables relate to the family environments of the twins. For example, the tracking decision for children is particularly influenced by the family resources and the decisions taken by the parents (Ditton & Krüsken 2006;Jähnen & Helbig 2015). Therefore, the source of a possible bias violating EEA can be located primarily inside the family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus so far has rather been on socially unequal educational trajectories at the national level [1,[21][22][23][24][25]. In addition, although a number of studies do exist that compare the states regarding the effects of individual school policy reforms [26][27][28], these studies are of limited applicability to the question of how school policy configurations (understood as the totality of school policy regulations) play out between the states as a whole. Considering all the studies on individual educational reforms together does not yield a clear picture of their effects on inequality of educational outcomes between the states, within states over time, and on social differences in the context of educational expansion.…”
Section: Research Context and Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, we assume that it is the combination of different legal regulations (structures and/or content) as school policy "regimes" that influences educational trajectories. Jähnen and Helbig [28], for example, examining the transition to secondary schools, find evidence that changes in school law cause not only parents to change their educational behavior but also teachers. As a result, individual school reforms do not change educational pathways.…”
Section: Studies On the Impact Of School Reforms On Educational Expan...mentioning
confidence: 99%