2008
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Einfluss von unterschiedlichen Registrierverfahren auf die Genauigkeit der navigiert-kontrollierten Fräse (Safety Assistance-Funktion) für die Mastoidektomie

Abstract: Significantly better results of the registration and drilling accuracy show up in group group 2. Thus the preconditions for clinical use are fulfilled.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various reasons why CI surgery seems to be predestined for computer-assisted improvements regardless of whether the research is focussed on one or more of the steps involved in CI surgery, such as:milling the implant bed [24, 25, 72];performing the mastoidectomy [35, 36, 73, 98, 99, 116];performing the cochleostomy through a minimally invasive access [57, 20, 23, 5153, 58, 6466, 114]; orautomated insertion of the electrode array [42, 67, 79, 90, 91]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various reasons why CI surgery seems to be predestined for computer-assisted improvements regardless of whether the research is focussed on one or more of the steps involved in CI surgery, such as:milling the implant bed [24, 25, 72];performing the mastoidectomy [35, 36, 73, 98, 99, 116];performing the cochleostomy through a minimally invasive access [57, 20, 23, 5153, 58, 6466, 114]; orautomated insertion of the electrode array [42, 67, 79, 90, 91]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the more distant targets yielded slightly larger values, confirming the significant impact of the distance between the registration and target points on the accuracy [7,8,21], even the maximum deviation of 1.2 mm is still within the range (1 to 2 mm) that is often considered ''clinically acceptable'' for navigation system accuracy [1,21,25,26]. Maxillary splint-based systems with extraoral extensions for reference markers have been used previously with sufficient navigational accuracy in neurosurgery (0.29-0.86 mm [17], 0.0-2.0 mm [27]), in sinus surgery (1.56 AE 0.76 mm [28]), and in the temporal region (0.73 AE 0.25 mm [17,29]); however, only a few of these systems have been tested for targets in the lateral skull base region [15,29,30,31]. Bale et al used a mouthpiecebased registration template held in place by a vacuum system to successfully cannulate the foramen ovale [30], but did not test its applicability for Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…other locations in the lateral skull base. In contrast, insufficient accuracy was reported in an in vitro model of mastoidectomy when using a navigation bow with integrated registration markers fixed to the upper jaw [15]. A major problem with the existing devices is the large bilateral extraoral reference frame [17,29,31], which does not allow the patient's head to be positioned on one side for surgery -a prerequisite for surgery at the lateral skull base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation