2010
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Elternbildfragebogen für Kinder- und Jugendliche (EBF-KJ)

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Der EBF-KJ ist ein klinisch ausgerichteter Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Repräsentation der Eltern-Kind-Beziehung aus der Sicht von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Er basiert auf der systemischen Familientheorie und der Familienstresstheorie. Der Fragebogen umfasst 36 Items pro Elternteil, die sich auf drei Ressourcenskalen (Kohäsion, Identifikation, Autonomie), fünf Risikoskalen (Konflikte, Ablehnung/Gleichgültigkeit, Bestrafung, emotionale Grenzüberschreitung, Ängste/Überprotektion) und die Zusatzs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the three subscales (23 items) with the most relevant content for the symptoms of eating disorders were applied and Cronbach’s Alpha of these scales reached α = 0.91 for “drive for thinness”, α = 0.95 for “bulimia” and α = 0.93 for “body dissatisfaction” in the study population. The quality of the relationship with the parents was measured with the Parental-Representation-Screening-Questionnaire (PRSQ); German Version [Elternbildfragebogen für Kinder- und Jugendliche (EBF-KJ)] for children and adolescents [ 32 ]. This German questionnaire, which was applied in this study in its original version, consists of 36 items answered on a 5-level Likert scale and contains three resource-scales (“cohesion”, “identification”, “autonomy”), five risk-scales (“conflicts”, “rejection/ neglect”, “punishment”, “emotional burden”, “fears/overprotection”) and one additional scale “aid”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, the three subscales (23 items) with the most relevant content for the symptoms of eating disorders were applied and Cronbach’s Alpha of these scales reached α = 0.91 for “drive for thinness”, α = 0.95 for “bulimia” and α = 0.93 for “body dissatisfaction” in the study population. The quality of the relationship with the parents was measured with the Parental-Representation-Screening-Questionnaire (PRSQ); German Version [Elternbildfragebogen für Kinder- und Jugendliche (EBF-KJ)] for children and adolescents [ 32 ]. This German questionnaire, which was applied in this study in its original version, consists of 36 items answered on a 5-level Likert scale and contains three resource-scales (“cohesion”, “identification”, “autonomy”), five risk-scales (“conflicts”, “rejection/ neglect”, “punishment”, “emotional burden”, “fears/overprotection”) and one additional scale “aid”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This German questionnaire, which was applied in this study in its original version, consists of 36 items answered on a 5-level Likert scale and contains three resource-scales (“cohesion”, “identification”, “autonomy”), five risk-scales (“conflicts”, “rejection/ neglect”, “punishment”, “emotional burden”, “fears/overprotection”) and one additional scale “aid”. The Cronbach's Alpha of this validated version were between α = 0.60 and α = 0.85 for students and between α = 0.73 and α = 0.90 for patients [ 32 ]. Due to the quantitative evaluation of our study, items with an open response form were not used and for reasons of content, three subscales were not included for analysis of this study (25 instead of 36 items were evaluated).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting total score describes the quality of the parent–child relationship. The PSRQ total index has been shown to have good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75) and retest-reliability (0.84; Titze et al 2010 ). Between-group analyses with non-parametric Mann–Whitney U tests revealed no significant differences between the quality of the relationship with the caregiver for youths raised by their biological parents and ELS youths [ U (48) = 228.0; Z = −1.24, p = .22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In den letzten Jahren wurden verschiedene Konzepte von väterlichem Engagement entworfen (Fthenakis, 1999;Hawkins et al, 2002;Hofferth et al, 2002;Palkovitz, 1997;Palkovitz, 2002;Pasley u. Braver, 2004) Die Beziehungsqualität zum Vater wurde aus Sicht des Kindes anhand der Skala der "Kohäsion" des Elternbildfragebogens (EBF-KJ) (Titze u. Lehmkuhl, 2010) erhoben. Die einzelnen Fragen werden anhand einer fünfstufigen Likertskala (von "nie" bis "immer") vom Kind beantwortet.…”
Section: Perspektiven Der Eltern Und Kinderunclassified