2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3757(20000502)112:9<1691::aid-ange1691>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der erste strukturell charakterisierte Metallkomplex mit dem Molekülbaustein MCCCCR2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that steric effects also explain why the dihedral angle between the planes [Ir,Cl,P1,P2] and [C1,C2,C8] is not 0° (as suggested by bonding arguments) but is 67.3(3)° and thus deviates significantly from the expected value. The Ir−C1 bond length (1.887(5) Å) is longer than in the vinylidene and butatrienylidene iridium analogues, trans -[IrCl(CCHCO 2 Me)(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ] (1.764(6) Å) 16b and trans -[IrCl(CCCCPh 2 )(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ] (1.816(6) Å), and is almost the same as in the methylene complex [Ir(CH 2 ){κ 3 -N(SiMe 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 2 }] (1.868(9) Å) 2 Molecular diagram of compound 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assume that steric effects also explain why the dihedral angle between the planes [Ir,Cl,P1,P2] and [C1,C2,C8] is not 0° (as suggested by bonding arguments) but is 67.3(3)° and thus deviates significantly from the expected value. The Ir−C1 bond length (1.887(5) Å) is longer than in the vinylidene and butatrienylidene iridium analogues, trans -[IrCl(CCHCO 2 Me)(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ] (1.764(6) Å) 16b and trans -[IrCl(CCCCPh 2 )(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ] (1.816(6) Å), and is almost the same as in the methylene complex [Ir(CH 2 ){κ 3 -N(SiMe 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 2 }] (1.868(9) Å) 2 Molecular diagram of compound 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…, 19, 1231Chem. -1236 PiPr 3 ) 2 ] (1.764(6) Å) 16b and trans-[IrCl(dCdCdCdCPh 2 )(PiPr 3 ) 2 ] (1.816( 6) Å), 19 and is almost the same as in the methylene complex [Ir(dCH 2 ){κ 3 -N(SiMe 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 2 }] (1.868( 9) Å). 20 The reactivity of the structurally related molecules 8 and 14 toward NaC 5 H 5 is quite different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to Ir‐C 4 and Mn‐C 4 cumulenic species 3a. 9 Prolonged storage of 3 in solution at room temperature resulted in [3,3′‐bis{ trans ‐(4‐ p ‐ tert ‐butylphenylbuta‐3‐en‐1‐yl)bis(tetraphenyl‐1,2‐diphosphinoethane)carbonyltungsten}] ( 4 ; Scheme ), and diffusion of pentane into a benzene solution of 3 gave brown crystals of the coupled molecule in 53 % yield. Formation of 4 can be envisaged to occur by coupling at the C3 atom of 3 with subsequent rearrangement of the diphosphine ligands from cis to trans 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%