Der Krieg Und Die Traumatischen Neurosen 1915
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-34644-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Krieg und die traumatischen Neurosen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
25

Year Published

1919
1919
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment approaches of the somatoform dissociative disorders in WWI soldiers depended largely on the prevailing understanding of their nature. Initially there were two general ways of understanding shell shock (including somatoform dissociative disorders): one was the view that they were essentially organically determined (e.g, Lépine, 1917;Mott, 1916;Oppenheim, 1915); the other was that they were expressions of cowardice and malingering. The latter view led to harsh approaches to soldiers exhibiting these symptoms, up to the point of executions for desertion.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment approaches of the somatoform dissociative disorders in WWI soldiers depended largely on the prevailing understanding of their nature. Initially there were two general ways of understanding shell shock (including somatoform dissociative disorders): one was the view that they were essentially organically determined (e.g, Lépine, 1917;Mott, 1916;Oppenheim, 1915); the other was that they were expressions of cowardice and malingering. The latter view led to harsh approaches to soldiers exhibiting these symptoms, up to the point of executions for desertion.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From about 1880, psychic paralysis and psychic shock became vexing problems in connection with traumatic neurosis (see: Fischer-Homberger, 1975;Oppenheim, 1889), and became examples of the apparent necessity of psychologizing neuropsychiatry. Yet the most distinguished neuropsychiatrists, such as Meynert, transcended this difference.…”
Section: Between Neurology and Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Equally one can postulate that medical historians use the term 'war neurotics question' most often when identifying presumed tendentious medical behaviour in the psychiatrists of that time, that is, showing how they allowed themselves to be used for political and social purposes. 9 Originally, what was understood by 'war neurosis' was a form of 'traumatic neurosis' in the Oppenheim (1915) sense. The neurologist Hermann Oppenheim had introduced this term in 1889.…”
Section: Changing Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%