2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1185709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der transinguinale Ultraschall zur Bestimmung der Hüftkopfzentrierung in der Behandlung der Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation

Abstract: Consequently, standard radiographic documentation is no longer used as a standard in our clinic. MRI and CT are reserved for special cases. We recommend transinguinal ultrasound as a standard diagnostic method for determination of the femoral head position in hip spica casts. With a portable ultasound system, determination of the hip position using transinguinal ultrasound is immediately possible in the operating theatre.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For some authors, sonography does not provide good images of the bone and the epiphysis [23]. Despite this, it has been repeatedly proved as a very useful method to describe the growth plate and its pathological changes in the current literature [19,24]. The tendency of the latest works seems to give more place to the use of US for the diagnosis; however, a standard work-up has not been established yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For some authors, sonography does not provide good images of the bone and the epiphysis [23]. Despite this, it has been repeatedly proved as a very useful method to describe the growth plate and its pathological changes in the current literature [19,24]. The tendency of the latest works seems to give more place to the use of US for the diagnosis; however, a standard work-up has not been established yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Included patients were children with DDH and dislocated or unstable hip(s) (Graf type III or IV), treated conservatively with closed reduction in SC. Before every cast changing, each hip was classified according to Graf and a new cast was performed if at least one hip was still dislocated or unstable (Graf type D, III and IV) [ 10 ]. If the hip was still dysplastic but not unstable (Graf type IIb or IIc), no further SC was used, and the treatment followed with a brace until the maturation of the acetabulum (Graf type 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once SC has been applied, the position of the head must be evaluated, to check if the hip is reduced or not [ 5 ]. Different techniques are available to verify the position of the femoral head in SC: X-ray [ 6 ], computer tomography (CT) [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], magnetic resonance (MR) [ 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 ] and ultrasound (US) [ 10 , 12 ]. According to Graf’s technique, ultrasound examination should be performed in a frontal standard plane, approaching the hip laterally and avoiding tilting errors of the probe [ 13 ] ( Figure 1 ); however, Graf’s method is not applicable in the presence of a SC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11]. Alternativ kann auch ein transinguinaler Ultraschall durchgeführt werden [12]. Mit einem portablen Ultraschallgerät kann die Hüftkopfzentrierung unmittelbar bei Gipsanlage bestimmt werden.…”
Section: Stellenwert Der Klinischen Untersuchungunclassified