2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeRisk — Accurate Prediction of ULS Wave Loads. Outlook and First Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences at higher orders are expected because no piston or boundary movement is included in the model. However, good consistency with experiments using this approach has been presented in earlier work Paulsen et al (2014a) and as part of DeRisk project Bredmose et al (2016) and Ghadirian et al (2016Ghadirian et al ( , 2017. A top view of the computational domains is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: The Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences at higher orders are expected because no piston or boundary movement is included in the model. However, good consistency with experiments using this approach has been presented in earlier work Paulsen et al (2014a) and as part of DeRisk project Bredmose et al (2016) and Ghadirian et al (2016Ghadirian et al ( , 2017. A top view of the computational domains is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: The Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The experiments were conducted at DHI Denmark in scale 1:50 as part of the DeRisk project (Bredmose et al 2016). The used shallow water wave basin was 35 m long and 25 m wide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from two sets of experiments are used in the present study, performed as part of the DeRisk project [19] and the Wave Loads project [20].…”
Section: Experiments and The Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike for the free surface, where, building on the fundamental work of Stokes, we expect a harmonic structure to the higher harmonics we do not have a similar theoretical basis, to arbitrary order, for forces on a column. Recent work [5,11], as well as unpublished work from the De-Risk project [20], does suggest that this may be a good model for non-breaking waves on columns. Clearly for breaking waves the physics is strongly non-linear and a model based on powers of some linear timeseries will not be appropriate.…”
Section: Focussed Wave-groupsmentioning
confidence: 97%