2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation and validation of thoracic sarcopenia assessment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although less often investigated than at the L3 level, muscle metrics at the T12 level have also been validated in assessment of outcomes in patients with other forms of cancer besides STS 17‐19 . Direct comparisons of muscle metrics measured at T12 vs L3 yield similar results in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, with agreement assessed yielding nearly perfect Cohen κ values (>0.85) 20 . Our study aims to analyze both muscle quantity (ie, SMI) and quality (ie, SMD) at the T12 vertebral level on staging chest CTs and determine their association with overall survival and event‐free survival in patients with grade 2 or 3 extremity and trunk STS undergoing surgical resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although less often investigated than at the L3 level, muscle metrics at the T12 level have also been validated in assessment of outcomes in patients with other forms of cancer besides STS 17‐19 . Direct comparisons of muscle metrics measured at T12 vs L3 yield similar results in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, with agreement assessed yielding nearly perfect Cohen κ values (>0.85) 20 . Our study aims to analyze both muscle quantity (ie, SMI) and quality (ie, SMD) at the T12 vertebral level on staging chest CTs and determine their association with overall survival and event‐free survival in patients with grade 2 or 3 extremity and trunk STS undergoing surgical resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this study defined sarcopenia based solely on skeletal muscle mass as measured by chest CT and did not directly assess physical activity or muscle function levels such as walking speed and grip strength due to retrospective design. However, considering previous reports [26,31], ESM and PM measurements using chest CT may reflect both physical activity and physiological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The main advantage of skeletal muscle mass measurement at the level of T2 and T12, compared to the commonly used skeletal muscle mass measurement at the level of L3, is that nearly all patients undergoing cardiac surgery have chest CT images available. With these insights, previous studies investigated a relationship between skeletal muscle mass at the levels of L3 and T12 and suggested that skeletal muscle mass measured at the level of T12 could be used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in patients with chest CT alone [30,31]. Tanimura et al found that CT-derived ESM at the level of T12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was an independent prognostic factor in survival [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Thoracic sarcopenia in TEVAR patients has been shown to be correlated with psoas muscle area and can also provide an assessment of sarcopenia in TEVAR patients. 28 Although the preoperative utility of quantifying sarcopenia is limited by the need for CT imaging and an experienced imaging reader, it should be considered in conjunction with ECOG scoring, when available, to provide a clearer picture of operative risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%