2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation and verification of an aerosol dynamics expression for the below-cloud scavenging process using the moment method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was noted that due to the large number of parameters which play a role in the below-cloud scavenging processes (such as the above: effectiveness of the collisions, critical droplet velocity and distribution of rain droplets and aerosol particle sizes), the scavenging coefficient has a large degree of variability [19]. Therefore, the correct parametrization of its properties plays a relevant role in both climate models and models concerning the distribution of pollution [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was noted that due to the large number of parameters which play a role in the below-cloud scavenging processes (such as the above: effectiveness of the collisions, critical droplet velocity and distribution of rain droplets and aerosol particle sizes), the scavenging coefficient has a large degree of variability [19]. Therefore, the correct parametrization of its properties plays a relevant role in both climate models and models concerning the distribution of pollution [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coarse particles (aerosol particle sizes are neither efficiently scavenged by Brownian diffusion nor by directional interception or inertial impaction, and this particle size range is called the "Greenfield gap" (Slinn, 1984). Recently, Bae et al (2010) added phoretic and electric charging effects to the collection efficiency assessment and found that the BWSCs increase by up to 20 times in the 0.2-3 μm particle size range. Wang et al (2014c) also improved the understanding of the electrical effects of the collision efficiency, which is also assumed to be a major source of uncertainty but is always ignored in theoretical estimations.…”
Section: Kdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raindrop number size distribution and raindrop terminal velocity are both represented by empirical mathematical functions, and these factors are non-negligible. In order to minimize the computational burden, the calculation of BWSCs in most global and regional-scale models are expressed as the product of rain intensity multiplied by the collection efficiency, where the later is simplified as a constant or calculated based on the work of Slinn (Bae et al, 2010;Slinn, 1984). This simplification may undoubtedly bring into large uncertainties and make the simulated wet deposition within a factor of two ranges of the observations, which is significant larger compared with the 30% bias of the prediction of air pollutants evaluation (Vet et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Kdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the considerable number of factors which play a role in the below-cloud processes, scavenging coefficients are characterized with a considerable degree of variability [18]. The application of adequate parameters for description of their characteristics poses a current problem in the descriptions of climate models and models that deal with the spatial distribution of pollutants [19]. Additionally, the scavenging coefficient Λ can seem complicated to an everyday reader, and it does not explain directly the scale of the process, since "the man in the street" could have problems interpreting the results of Λ reported here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%