2012
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of a benchmark for freshwater ionic strength

Abstract: Abstract-Because increased ionic strength has caused deleterious ecological changes in freshwater streams, thresholds for effects are needed to inform resource-management decisions. In particular, effluents from surface coal mining raise the ionic strength of receiving streams. The authors developed an aquatic life benchmark for specific conductance as a measure of ionic strength that is expected to prevent the local extirpation of 95% of species from neutral to alkaline waters containing a mixture of dissolve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
124
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field data sets were obtained for West Virginia and Kentucky, USA [2] in Appalachia including ecoregions 68 (Southwestern Appalachia), 69 (Central Appalachia), and 70 (Western Alleghany Plateau) [14]. The Watershed Assessment Database (WABbase), which was obtained from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, is described by Cormier et al [1] and was used to derive the conductivity benchmark. Additional information sources were used, including (1) toxicity tests from peer-reviewed literature [7]; (2) information on the effects of ionic mixtures on freshwater invertebrates from standard texts and physiological reviews [8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; (3) a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Region 3 data set from Gregory J. Pond, which includes the original data found in Pond et al [6] and data collected for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Assessment [24]; (4) data on the composition of Marcellus shale brine from Amy Bergdale, U.S. EPA Region 3, based on analyses by drilling operators; (5) data from the Kentucky Division of Water database [2]; and (6) geographic and related information from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and public sources [1,2].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Field data sets were obtained for West Virginia and Kentucky, USA [2] in Appalachia including ecoregions 68 (Southwestern Appalachia), 69 (Central Appalachia), and 70 (Western Alleghany Plateau) [14]. The Watershed Assessment Database (WABbase), which was obtained from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, is described by Cormier et al [1] and was used to derive the conductivity benchmark. Additional information sources were used, including (1) toxicity tests from peer-reviewed literature [7]; (2) information on the effects of ionic mixtures on freshwater invertebrates from standard texts and physiological reviews [8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; (3) a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Region 3 data set from Gregory J. Pond, which includes the original data found in Pond et al [6] and data collected for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Assessment [24]; (4) data on the composition of Marcellus shale brine from Amy Bergdale, U.S. EPA Region 3, based on analyses by drilling operators; (5) data from the Kentucky Division of Water database [2]; and (6) geographic and related information from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and public sources [1,2].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 163 benthic invertebrate genera appearing in the West Virginia species sensitivity distribution (SSD) list are observed at some sites below 100 mS/cm except Hydroporus (lowest occurrence at 168 mS/cm); therefore, low conductivity is not a limiting factor [1,2]. However, 24.5% of genera are never observed at >1,500 mS/cm (Table 1).…”
Section: Co-occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations