2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of a macroscopic model for nutrient uptake by hairy-roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we consider Cartesian geometry rather than the more computationally complex cylindrical geometry (Ptashnyk, in press) (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we consider Cartesian geometry rather than the more computationally complex cylindrical geometry (Ptashnyk, in press) (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Mathematical Notes S1 we derived the effective equations using multiscale expansion. A proof that these equations are actually the unique limit of this homogenization problem when ε → 0 can be found in Ptashnyk (in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, we have that the operator K : L ∞ (0, T ; W(Ω)) → L ∞ (0, T ; W(Ω)), defined by K( u ε ) = u ε , where u ε is a weak solution of (1), is a contraction for sufficiently smallT , where T depend on the coefficients in the equations and is independent of (p ε , n ε , b ε , u ε ). Hence, using the Banach fixed point theorem and iterating over time intervals, we obtain the existence of a unique weak solution of the microscopic problem (1) Due to the fact that viscous term is defined only in the cell wall matrix and is zero for cell wall microfibrils, to conduct the multiscale analysis of the viscoelastic problem (1) we first consider a perturbed problem by adding the inertial term ϑ∂ 2 t u ε , where ϑ > 0 is a small perturbation parameter: (25) ϑχ…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 4.3. A sequence of solutions (u ε , p ε , n ε , b ε ), of the microscopic problem (2), (3), (25), converges to a solution (u ϑ , p ϑ , n ϑ , b ϑ ) of the macroscopic perturbed equations…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying the theory of invariant regions [51, Theorem 2] and [55,Theorem 14.7], we obtain the non-negativity of n ε j , j = 1, 2, and b ε in the same way as in the proof of Theorem 3.3. Taking n ε and b ε as test functions in (12) and using the non-negativity of n ε j and b ε and the boundedness of p ε , along with the assumptions on F n , Q n , Q b , and J n , see Assumption 1, yield (49) n ε (τ ) 2…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%