2009
DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-2-81-2009
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of a numerical solution of the 3D coupled velocity field for an ice sheet – ice shelf system, incorporating both full and approximate stress solutions

Abstract: Abstract. To overcome the mechanical coupling of an ice sheet with an ice shelf, one single set of velocity equations is presented covering both the sheet and the shelf. This set is obtained by applying shared sheet-shelf approximations. The hydrostatic approximation and a constant density are the only approximations that are applied to the full-Stokes momentum equations. The remaining stress terms from the momentum equations and the stress terms from the usual ice-flow law are multiplied by coefficients which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary, the ice dynamical equations are favorably solved on a grid with rectangular coordinates because the transformation of the ice dynamical equations to geographical coordinates introduces many extra complicating terms, in particular given the tendency of including more and more stress terms (see e.g. Pattyn, 2003;Reerink et al, 2009). Moreover calculations with a GCM are very time consuming and therefore only limited runs can be performed with a relatively coarse resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary, the ice dynamical equations are favorably solved on a grid with rectangular coordinates because the transformation of the ice dynamical equations to geographical coordinates introduces many extra complicating terms, in particular given the tendency of including more and more stress terms (see e.g. Pattyn, 2003;Reerink et al, 2009). Moreover calculations with a GCM are very time consuming and therefore only limited runs can be performed with a relatively coarse resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%