Derivation of Aggregation-Based Joint Operating Rule Curves for Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs

Abstract

Operating rule curves have been widely applied to reservoir operation, due to their ease of implementation. However, these curves are generally used for single reservoirs and have rarely been applied to cascade reservoirs. This study was conducted to derive joint operating rule curves for cascade hydropower reservoirs. Steps in the proposed methodology include: (1) determining the optimal release schedule using dynamic programming to solve a deterministic long-term operation model, (2) identifying the forms of operating rule curves suitable for cascade hydropower reservoirs based on the optimal release schedule, (3) constructing a simulation-based optimization model and then using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) to identify the key points of the operating rule curves, (4) testing and verifying the efficiency of the generated joint operating rule curves using synthetic inflow series. China's Qing River cascade hydropower reservoirs (the Shuibuya, Geheyan and Gaobazhou reservoirs) were selected for a case study. When compared with the conventional operating rule curves, the annual power generation can be increased by 2.62% (from 7.27 to 7.46 billion kWh) using the observed inflow from 1951 to 2005, as well as by about 1.77% and 2.52% using the synthetic inflows generated from two alternative hydrologic simulation methods. Linear operating rules were also implemented to simulate coordinated operation of the Qing River cascade hydropower reservoirs. The joint operating rule curves were more efficient and reliable than conventional operating rule curves and linear operating rules, indicating that the proposed method can greatly improve hydropower generation and work stability.

Use of Many-Objective Visual Analytics to Analyze Water Supply Objective Trade-Offs with Water Transfer

“…China (Hsu et al 2004; Liu et al 2011;Guo et al 2013;Li et al 2015). Although this 126 approach does not directly consider the economic value of each use in the operation process, 127 it does consider the priority of each use with the priority order reduced from the top to the 128 bottom.…”

A Heuristic Dynamically Dimensioned Search with Sensitivity Information (HDDS-S) and Application to River Basin Management

“…The main difference between the multi-reservoir operation model and river basin model is that the decision variables in multi-reservoir operation models are reservoir operation rule curves, which consist of a series of storage volumes or levels at different periods, and the aim of multi-reservoir optimal operation is to establish reservoir operation rule curves at the planning/design stage and provide long-term operation guidelines for reservoir managers to meet expected water demands [37][38][39]. Therefore, the decision variables, which will be optimized in the two optimization problems, are parameters of the river basin model and multi-reservoir optimal operation model, and the dimension being varied is the number of model parameter values being changed to generate a new search neighbourhood.…”

Real-Time Flood Control by Tree-Based Model Predictive Control Including Forecast Uncertainty: A Case Study Reservoir in Turkey

“…Their control poses a challenging problem, since it must cope with different conflicting objectives as water supply, hydropower, and flood control [1][2][3][4][5]. Operating with guide curves is a common practice in typical reservoir operation [6][7][8]. These operating strategies however, rely on long term records that can filter and underestimate extreme events such as drought and flood conditions [9].…”