1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(94)05083-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of canopy resistance for water vapour fluxes over a spruce forest, using a new technique for the viscous sublayer resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used R a and R b parameterization as suggested (32)(33)(34). R a is dependent only on the atmospheric stability (i.e., turbulence).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used R a and R b parameterization as suggested (32)(33)(34). R a is dependent only on the atmospheric stability (i.e., turbulence).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal relative precision requirements ( C max /C in %) assuming a maximum HNO 3 deposition flux (R c =0) for a grassland site (NEU) and a forest site (EGER). For the forest site different parameterizations for R b existing in literature (Businger, 1986;Hummelshoj, 1995, 1997;Meyers et al, 1989) are applied. stable conditions (32% at the forest site) to less than 10% at the grassland (around 5% at the forest site) for labile conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of Atmospheric Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ecosystem-scale light response curves were derived using all available peak wet season daytime data. Canopy conductance exchange with the atmosphere was calculated as proposed by Herbst et al (2002) and Jensen and Hummelshoj (1995). This approach includes the influence of leaf area index (LAI), where only peak season values were used for analysis.…”
Section: Flux Partitioning and Ecosystem-physiological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%