2012
DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of electronic course templates for use in higher education

Abstract: Lecturers in higher education often consider the incorporation of web technologies into their teaching practice. Partially structured and populated course site templates could aid them in getting started with creating and deploying web-based materials and activities to enrich the teaching and learning experience. Discussions among instructional technology support staff and lecturers reveal a paucity of robust specifications for possible course site features that could comprise a template. An attempted mapping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the goal of designing and producing electronic course templates is to facilitate building electronic course sites by academic staff Á quickly and easily, as well as to make the student learning experience more structured and consistent (see Paper III Á forthcoming). Paper I in this series (Hill et al, 2012) investigated 'how to find, describe and categorise course design dimensions that will inform our construction of electronic course templates, embracing the widest variety of notions that are expressed informally by instructors' (p. 5). We proposed a lattice model ( Figure 1 in this paper), interweaving Pedagogical Dimensions (Logistical, Practice, Purpose and Participation) with Course Site Properties (User Roles, User Experience, Functionality and Tools, Initial Content and Technical System Settings).…”
Section: Literature Snapshotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the goal of designing and producing electronic course templates is to facilitate building electronic course sites by academic staff Á quickly and easily, as well as to make the student learning experience more structured and consistent (see Paper III Á forthcoming). Paper I in this series (Hill et al, 2012) investigated 'how to find, describe and categorise course design dimensions that will inform our construction of electronic course templates, embracing the widest variety of notions that are expressed informally by instructors' (p. 5). We proposed a lattice model ( Figure 1 in this paper), interweaving Pedagogical Dimensions (Logistical, Practice, Purpose and Participation) with Course Site Properties (User Roles, User Experience, Functionality and Tools, Initial Content and Technical System Settings).…”
Section: Literature Snapshotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provided two example templates Á 'Cornerstones' and 'Web 2.0' which reflect respectively 'a strong need for a simple Figure 1. Lattice model for course templates (Source: Hill, Fresen, and Geng, 2012). course template for distribution of materials, teacher-to-student .…”
Section: Literature Snapshotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This solution hoped to satisfy student expectations in a way that did not jeopardise pedagogical creativity. This example also demonstrates how the Group developed the template with pedagogical value as its underpinning principle (Hill, Fresen, and Geng 2012) to influence re-interpretation of policy.…”
Section: Contradictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One case study by Glover et al (2012, p. 29) reports on how establishing a minimum standard motivated staff to 'explore and interact with technology'. There are two studies who focus explicitly on the design work of institutional VLE course templates (Fresen, Hill, and Geng 2014;Hill, Fresen and Geng 2012). This research team's interest is in arguing that partially structured and populated VLE module sites can influence academics' adoption of technologies through embedded instructional design.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%