2013
DOI: 10.17146/aij.2013.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of Inter-Atomic Force Constants of Cu<sub>2</sub>O from Diffuse Neutron Scattering Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values of the effective force constants obtained from DINS experiments in Ni 44 Nb 56 compare favourably with the values reported in the literature for other glassy systems and parent compounds (e.g. metal oxides) used for glass synthesis [43,[103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]. They yield 0.75 eV Å 2, and 0.91 eV Å 2 in the case of nickel and niobium, respectively, and are equal to the average force constant values, calculated based on the ab initio HLD simulations for crystals of nickel, niobium and NiNb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The mean values of the effective force constants obtained from DINS experiments in Ni 44 Nb 56 compare favourably with the values reported in the literature for other glassy systems and parent compounds (e.g. metal oxides) used for glass synthesis [43,[103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]. They yield 0.75 eV Å 2, and 0.91 eV Å 2 in the case of nickel and niobium, respectively, and are equal to the average force constant values, calculated based on the ab initio HLD simulations for crystals of nickel, niobium and NiNb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Specifically, the Sakuma modeling uniquely enables the retrieval of information concerning the local dynamic structure, encoded within the correlation coefficients (λ r ss ′ ). The λ r ss ′ parameters are proportional to the coordination number (CN) of each shell and to the force constants of the material and inversely proportional to their pair distance r . ,, The λ r ss ′ relation with the CN is visible at low r , giving oscillatory trends in Figure a when comparing the yellow bars (CN) with the solid lines of the λ r ss ′ coefficients. This behavior stems from the fact that a larger number of atoms within a given shell results in greater forces acting on the individual atom, thus intensifying the correlation motion that draws the atoms toward the respective shell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the same structure is made of a different element, different force constants between each atomic pair will be present, reducing or increasing the λ r ss ′ modulus for the stiffer or softer bonding of this new element. Equations relating the correlation coefficient with the force constants are given by Sakuma et al , Nevertheless, for stronger atomic bonds and closer pair distances, the correlation coefficients should be higher (maximum 1) and tend to zero for large r values due to the reduction of the forces between the pair of atoms at larger distances. The λ r ss ′ coefficients, retrieved from the Sakuma modeling of the TDS for the simulated nanospheres, are plotted in Figure for the three temperatures considered, 298, 200, and 100 K (respectively a, b, and c, in Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%