2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-v-3-2020-417-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of Supraglacial Debris Cover by Machine Learning Algorithms on the Gee Platform: A Case Study of Glaciers in the Hunza Valley

Abstract: Abstract. Calculating the spatial-temporal distribution of supraglacial debris cover on glaciers is essential for understanding mass balance processes, glacier lake outburst floods, hydrological predictions, and glacier fluctuations that have attracted attention in recent years. However, due to the reflectance of supraglacial debris is similar to that of non-glacier slopes, mapping supraglacial debris cover based on optical remote sensing remains challenging. In this paper, we used NDSI and machine learning al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted, machine/deep learning algorithms have been widely utilized to map debriscovered glaciers [45][46][47][48][49], including artificial neural networks (ANN), the support vector machine (SVM), the random forest (RF) classifier [34], and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Nevertheless, applying these machine learning techniques is limited by cloud cover, rough terrain, mountain shadows, and freshly frozen lakes [49].…”
Section: Glacier Delineationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted, machine/deep learning algorithms have been widely utilized to map debriscovered glaciers [45][46][47][48][49], including artificial neural networks (ANN), the support vector machine (SVM), the random forest (RF) classifier [34], and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Nevertheless, applying these machine learning techniques is limited by cloud cover, rough terrain, mountain shadows, and freshly frozen lakes [49].…”
Section: Glacier Delineationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object-based image analysis was applied in surface segmentation, e.g., glacier mapping [37,292], definition of debris-covered glaciers [292,293], and rock glacier detection [141]. Machine/deep-learning classifiers continue to develop and find application in identifying cryospheric factors [35], e.g., glacier delineations [34,[294][295][296][297], debris-covered glacier mapping [45][46][47][48]298], snow cover and depth [35], rock glacier distributions [141], etc. However, quantities of visual interpretation and manual work remain indispensable in pre-processing and post-processing, especially for outlining surge-type glaciers [16].…”
Section: Summary Of Cryosphere Studies From Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, variations in the debris cover across the whole Karakoram region remain unknown. Mapping glaciers with debris cover is still challenging (Paul et al, 2004;Pfeffer et al, 2014;Farinotti et al, 2020), with various data and approaches having been proposed to address this issue, including using SAR (synthetic aperture radar) coherence maps, optical bands, thermal infrared features, terrain parameters, machine learning, and other methods (Bhambri et al, 2011;Mölg et al, 2018;Alifu et al, 2020;Xie et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, variations in the debris cover across the whole Karakoram region remains unknown. Mapping glaciers with debris cover is still challenging (Paul et al, 2004;Pfeffer et al, 2014;Farinotti et al, 2020), with various data and approaches having been proposed 120 to address this issue, including using SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) coherence maps, optical bands, thermal infrared features, terrain parameters, machine learning and other methods (Bhambri et al, 2011;Mölg et al, 2018;Alifu et al, 2020;Xie et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%