1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00710895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of the relationship between the Obukhov stability parameter and the bulk Richardson number for flux-profile studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests in conditions of z 0 from 10 5 to 10 1 m and z 0 /z m from 0Ð5 to 7Ð3 were shown to generally yield estimates within a few percent of those found using iteration (Launiainen, 1995).…”
Section: Parameterizations and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tests in conditions of z 0 from 10 5 to 10 1 m and z 0 /z m from 0Ð5 to 7Ð3 were shown to generally yield estimates within a few percent of those found using iteration (Launiainen, 1995).…”
Section: Parameterizations and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For practical applications, this is inconvenient. Byun (1990) and Launiainen (1995) gave a series of empirical expressions for z/L as a function of Ri b (bulk Richardson number). In this study, we used Launiainen's solution to parameterize L for an unstable region,…”
Section: Parameterizations and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is avoided in the heat flux parameterization proposed by Launiainen and Cheng (1995) and Launiainen (1995), abbreviated LC95. It is based on a semi-analytical relationship between the bulk Richardson-number and the Obukhov stability parameter ζ = z/L, which is the dimensionless fraction of the respective measurement height z (2.4 m) and the Obukhov-length L. Universal Functions for momentum M and sensible heat H from Businger et al (1971), Dyer (1974), and Högström (1988) for unstable conditions, and for stable conditions the function suggested by Holtslag and De Bruin (1988), are used to derive the bulk transfer coefficients instead.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most problems result from uncertainties in the appropriate determination of the bulk aerodynamic transfer coefficients for sensible and latent heat over snow and ice (Louis, 1979;Banke et al, 1980;Overland, 1985;Andreas and Murphy, 1986;Andreas, 2002), the aerodynamic roughness expressed by drag coefficients (Guest and Davidson, 1991) as well as the estimation of the surface roughness lengths (Andreas, 1987) and stability correction terms for the universal functions (e.g. Handorf et al, 1999;Holtslag and DeBruin, 1988;Launiainen, 1995;Grachev et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partially corrected transfer coefficient is then recalculated and so the cycle goes. Strub and Powell (1987) and Launiainen (1995), presented an alternative based on estimation of the bulk Richardson number, Ri B , defined as: where it is specified that C HN = C WN = C HWN . Figure A2 illustrates the relationship between the degree of atmospheric stratification (as described by both the bulk Richardson number and the Monin-Obukhov stability parameter) and the transfer coefficients scaled by their neutral value.…”
Section: Ammentioning
confidence: 99%